From: trevjon@btinternet.com   
      
   "Rachel Spencer"  wrote in message   
   news:1135434106.095973.14210@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...   
   > If the findings tend towards a muder theory, yes.  I know deep down   
   > this was no accident and so do you.   
      
   Don't make stupid assumptions about people you have never met and don't   
   know.   
      
      
      
   > You have an agenda   
      
      
   Don't make stupid assumptions about people you have never met and don't   
   know.   
      
      
      
   >and you are   
   > doing whatever you can to promote the accident theory.  Do you work for   
   > the royals or just associate with them?  Geez, at this point I think   
   > you could be Fatty Soames trolling the net as Trvejon.   
      
   Don't make stupid assumptions about people you have never met and don't   
   know.   
      
   Are you so naive (or arrogant) to suggest that anyone with a different point   
   of view to yourself must have an agenda? You don't know my opinions of the   
   royals, but just stupidly assume that anyone taking a contrary position to   
   yourself must be "one of them".  Just because I take up a different position   
   with regard to the death of Diana does not automatically mean I support the   
   royals.  Why would you think this?  Where have I ever mentioned support for   
   the royals?  Wooly thinking on your behalf yet again.   
      
   You are totally entitled to your point-of-view, but are stupid to even   
   suggest that anyone with an opposite view is somehow working to an agenda,   
   and is incapable of rational and independent thought.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)