From: bern.boergeenreclame@planet.nl   
      
   "Rachel Spencer"  schreef in bericht   
   news:1135434106.095973.14210@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...   
   > If the findings tend towards a muder theory, yes.   
      
   If not, you will no doubt dismiss the Inquiry as being part of a cover up.   
   You clearly suffer from a closed mind. I find it disturbing that people with   
   a mindset like yours can get on juries in the USA. Facts, evidence etc, are   
   of no importance because you already "know" what happened.   
      
   >I know deep down   
   > this was no accident and so do you.   
      
   This is straight from Dr Fernandez' Summer School for Advanced Bananalogy.   
      
   >You have an agenda and you are   
   > doing whatever you can to promote the accident theory.   
      
   The known evidence proves it was an accident. Fayed hasn't come up with one   
   piece of evidence that suggests otherwise. Do you never wonder why? Couldn't   
   it be the case that YOUR theories aren't in accordance with what actually   
   happened?   
      
   >Do you work for   
   > the royals or just associate with them?   
      
   This also straight from the Summer School  for Advanced Bananalogy. Why is   
   it so difficult to accept for many conspiracy theorists that their opponents   
   think for themselves and reach their own conclusions?   
      
   >Geez, at this point I think   
   > you could be Fatty Soames trolling the net as Trvejon.   
      
   "Fatty Soames", also straight from Dr Fernandez' mouth. I presume you had   
   never heard of Soames before your conspiracy chum "banana" mentioned him. I   
   also think that is obvious that most of your ideas are not your own; too   
   much bananaspeak.   
      
   B. B.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)