XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.conspiracy.america-at-war,   
   uk.current-events.terrorism   
   XPost: uk.transport   
   From: d@example.com   
      
   "Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message   
   news:dpfam7$i2r$1@genet.malloc.co.uk...   
   >d wrote:   
   >> "Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message   
   >> news:dpe5v3$cjp$2@genet.malloc.co.uk...   
   >>> d wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> If you're in PUBLIC, you have no right to PRIVACY.   
   >>> Wrong.   
   >>   
   >> Pardon my french, but how the fuck does that work?  You can demand the   
   >> full force of the law move people on who are looking at you?  You can   
   >> scream at people to stop looking at you?   
   >>   
   >> There is no law stopping people from looking at you in public.  There is   
   >> no law stopping people from making notes of your whereabouts at any time.   
   >> Heck, they're even allowed to follow you around making even more notes.   
   >> :)   
   >   
   > In fact they are not, as the case of Naomi Campbell vs the Mirror group,   
   > showed. Despite Ms Campbell being in a public place and despite their   
   > being no right to privacy in UK law, it was ruled an invasion of her right   
   > to privacy to be photographed leaving a Narcotics Anonymous meeting.   
      
   That was a one-off case.  If normal folks tried that claim, it wouldn't   
   work.  If Naomi Campbell wasn't a strung-out coked-up angry model, I doubt   
   that ruling would have been made. :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)