XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.talk.royalty
From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk
In article , Yoko
writes
>"Philster" wrote in message
>news:1138674038.642266.277350@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> One question keeps returning to me when reading of this (these)
>> developments..
>> Will it actually hapen, that IF, in the event of a conspiracy, ALL the
>> facts, ALL the truth, ALL the events will be revealed? Or are we to
>> witness the same spinelessness that has provided us with the type of
>> conundrums that have followed JFK's murder in Dallas?
>> It would be very interesting to see if the British would be able to
>> resist the "neck-saving" methods that has haunted any investigation
>> into the WHOLE truth becoming public knowledge in the USA.
>> Somehow, I doubt it. Total Honesty , at this level, would be impossible
>> to expect.
>>
>> I don't know if there was a cover up....and don't believe one thing nor
>> the other as yet... so I put this forward as an interesting viewpoint.
>>
>> Is this "run through" of the facts, going to do a better job than the
>> Warren Commission?
>
>The ID of JFK's killers are pretty well known to most 'officials' in
>the White House, always have been. The reason it's still a 'big secret'
>is because the group that did it are *still* being financed directly or
>indirectly by the CIA, and of course , Joe Public would (might) go ape-shit
>if it found that out.
>
>Shit always rolls down hill - so in the case of Diana, a few lower rank MI6
>heads will roll......then everyone will be happy.
>
>Prince Charles will not go to court.
>
>IMHO.
Maybe, although I can't remember any MI6 heads ever rolling in public,
in the sense of getting jailed for what they did when they were in MI6.
The spook world is all more hush-hush in the UK than it is in the US.
People who understand that spooks are involved in drug-dealing, murder,
cultural and political manipulation, laundering money, planting media
stories, and all sorts of criminality, tend to get shouted down as
'mentally ill' by middle-ranking fuckwits who are ever-so-happy with
their social position, and love to repeat 'what the system says about
itself' as though it's gospel truth.
(Ditto, whereas in the US it's common knowledge that all congressmen and
senators etc. are as corrupt as fuck, in the UK you hear about 'that
sleazeball Neil Hamilton who took cash for questions', and he then
appears on TV gameshows fielding jokes about brown envelopes, and his
wife plugs her book by selling her image as a 'battle-axe').
But despite this...if some lower-ranking MI6 heads do roll in public
over the Paris car crash, people are unlikely to buy the idea that the
'royal' family weren't involved (IMO). The assassination required a lot
of manpower.
It's possible though that they will run with the story that MI6 guys
were involved in dirty tricks but only of a 'venal' rather than a
'deadly' kind, i.e. not anything to do with murder - and not anything
involving the 'royal' family. Propagandists can certainly come up with
some crazy stories.
Part of the reason for the current story, I think, fronted by 'Lord'
Stevens, may just be to justify delaying the English inquest, in terms
other than those relating to what's going on in the French judicial
system.
--
banana "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you
give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to
Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the
rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
