XPost: alt.talk.royalty   
   From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article <1139258693.053005.110090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,   
   mjcar@btinternet.com writes   
      
   >That's the real mystery, folks.   
   >   
   >It's sad that someone feels the need to obsess about this hackneyed   
   >drivel, but if they must, at least a message board such as this is the   
   >appropriate place.   
   >   
   >Cross-posting it to places such as alt.talk.royalty is discourteous and   
   >ignorant.   
      
   Did you read the charter of alt.talk.royalty before you wrote that? Did   
   you know it had one?   
      
   Ignorant of what, and discourteous to whom, dickhead?   
      
   Oh, and when you say "places such as alt.talk.royalty", would you care   
   to name some?   
      
   The alt.talk.royalty charter states:   
      
   "The group is oriented to discussion of royalty and nobility of all   
   nationalities, both present day and historical. Discussions of the   
   British royal family, the possibility of a restored Russian monarchy,   
   Henry VIII's foibles, and the forms of address used in the Spanish court   
   would all be appropriate."   
      
   What I post to alt.talk.royalty is completely on-topic. If you don't   
   want to read it, don't.   
      
   >Take a bow, Fruit Boy.   
      
   Isn't it just that you only want people to post to alt.talk.royalty who   
   think the Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburgs *aren't* filth?   
      
   Follow-ups set.   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)