XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.america, alt.conspira
y.america-at-war
XPost: us.politics
From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk
In article , Bill
Oreilly writes
>Didn't bother watching more than five minutes. Too boring. Most of what i
>saw is pure spin and uncorroborated evidence.
Ah, right, and the story that the Old Man of the Mountains did it, from
his redoubt in the Hindu Kush of Afghanistan, is what? Solidly supported
fact? Not a 'conspiracy theory' then?
>Let me simplify the 9/11 conspiracy. Why attach an explosive device to a Jet
>full of fuel? and would it not be have been noticed by air traffic
>control/ground staff and crew? Idiotic. Secondly the collapse of the
>buildings is consistent with expert architectural opinions.
You mean the official story about the collapse, not the collapse itself.
Do please try to differentiate.
Many 'experts' say the official story is NOT consistent with what
happened. E.g. I know one structural engineer who has been in charge of
some very large civil projects, who says that it would be impossible for
impact from the aircraft to cause the buildings to collapse.
The story that the engineers forgot that aircraft carry fuel, or forgot
that aircraft could be used as missiles, is complete bullshit.
The time taken for the collapse screams 'explosion low down'. Floors
take longer to 'pancake'.
Out of interest, are you aware that early US media reports said there
had been large explosions in the basements? And that, Bill, is a fact -
not an opinion.
--
banana "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you
give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to
Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the
rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
