XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.america, alt.conspira   
   y.america-at-war   
   XPost: us.politics   
   From: user@btinternet.com   
      
   > Many 'experts' say the official story is NOT consistent with what   
   > happened.   
      
   Who are these "Many Experts" you speak of? Care to name them? Seriously you   
   cannot compare the Twin Towers to any other building. If you wish to learn   
   more about why the Twin Towers Collapsed through Science and Engineering you   
   will do well to read the facts from a reputable source naming reputable   
   engineers such as; Charles Clifton, structural engineer at the New Zealand   
   Heavy Engineering Research Association, Gregory Fenves, professor of civil   
   engineering at the University of California, Eduardo Kausel, professor of   
   civil and environmental engineering at Massachusetts Institute of   
   Technology, Robert McNamara, president of the US structural engineering   
   firm, McNamara and Salvia, Oral Buyukozturk, professor of civil and   
   environmental engineering.   
      
   Click on this link and learn something about the real reasons why the   
   building collapsed. The evidence is overwhelming against a conspiracy   
   theory.   
      
   http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/S/science/engineering   
   news_towers.html   
      
      
   E.g. I know one structural engineer who has been in charge of   
   > some very large civil projects, who says that it would be impossible for   
   > impact from the aircraft to cause the buildings to collapse.   
      
   Having knowledge of "some very large civil projects" does not ncessarily   
   equate to knowledge of  high rise tube structures. It is a highly   
   specialised field.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)