XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.america, alt.conspira   
   y.america-at-war   
   XPost: us.politics   
   From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article , Bill   
   Oreilly  writes   
   >> Many 'experts' say the official story is NOT consistent with what   
   >> happened.   
   >   
   >Who are these "Many Experts" you speak of? Care to name them? Seriously you   
   >cannot compare the Twin Towers to any other building.   
      
   The laws of physics apply to all buildings, and the requirement of   
   considering the possibility of aircraft impact applies to all such tall   
   buildings.   
      
      
      
   >E.g. I know one structural engineer who has been in charge of   
   >> some very large civil projects, who says that it would be impossible for   
   >> impact from the aircraft to cause the buildings to collapse.   
   >   
   >Having knowledge of "some very large civil projects" does not ncessarily   
   >equate to knowledge of  high rise tube structures. It is a highly   
   >specialised field.   
      
   True but the guy is by no means a radical and I have no reason to think   
   he would jump to conclusions contradictory to US government propaganda   
   unless he was on strong ground.   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)