XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.america, alt.conspira
y.america-at-war
XPost: us.politics
From: inuit@canoemail.com
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:16:01 -0000, "oO" wrote:
>Then why ask 'even bigger than the Americunts' then answer 'I doubt it'...
Because even if the Venezuelans can field two million men against one
hundred thousand Americunts, then the Americunts would easily win in a
head on confrontation. This is because of the Americunts overwhelming
firepower and technology.
Grunts on the ground are not the only, or even most important, part of
the equation. The Venezuelans may well be superior numerically, but
the Americunts are superior technologically, and it is technology that
matters in conventional warfare. Which is why the Americunts should
never be fought conventionally. Fortunatly they are vulnerable to
asymmetric warfare.
>> If millions of Venezuelan troops meet thousands of Americunts head on,
>> the Venezuelans will not stand a chance.
>Really? Why is that? I seem to remember people thinking the same thing about
>US troops in Viet Nam.
If the Vietcong had met the Americunts head on in a conventional
conflict, the war would have ended quickly in an Americunt victory.
It is only because the Vietcong were masters of asymmetric warfare
that they could give the Americunts a much deserved ass kicking and
drive the bastards out of their country.
>> I hope the Venezuelans know this.
>I'm sure they are pretty clued up on military strategy.
Yes, I would think so.
>> If they do, they can defeat the Americunts and keep Venezuela free.
>Lets hope so.
Exactly.
Clough
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
