XPost: alt.talk.royalty, alt.gossip.royalty   
   From: bern.boergeenreclame@planet.nl   
      
   "volcaran"  schreef in bericht   
   news:1142209045.524746.157400@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...   
   >   
   > banana wrote:   
   >> In article <1142197498.927153.214640@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,   
   >> cj.buyers@virgin.net writes   
      
   [snip]   
      
   >> Would you agree that if a driver really were heavily drunk,   
   >   
   > The blood tests didn't show he was "heavily drunk", they showed he was   
   > about 3.5 times over the legal limit for driving in France. That's the   
   > equivalent of about three glasses of wine. Not "heavily drunk" unless   
   > your alcohol tolerance is pretty low but sufficiently alcohol impaired   
   > for driving to present potential problems.   
      
   [snip]   
      
   When Henri Paul returned to the Ritz he drank ricard. The bartender who   
   served the ricard testified that Paul ordered and drank ricard. The bar   
   receipt is part of the body of evidence the French investigative magistrates   
   used to reach their conclusions. Fayed and "banana" have ignored this   
   evidence because it doesn't fit in their conspiracy theories. Or did I miss   
   something and did they explain this evidence away?   
      
   B. B.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)