XPost: alt.talk.royalty, alt.gossip.royalty   
   From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article , Brian Pears   
    writes   
   >   
   >>>Breton wrote:   
   >>>>>If he says he wasn't there, then he wasn't there as far as I am   
   >>>>>concerned.   
   >>>   
   >>>Banana retorted:   
   >>>>You're a bit of an idiot then, aren't you?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Don't you think most murderers will say they were somewhere else, if   
   >>>>they can get away with it?   
   >   
   >Brian P interjected:   
   >>>Your arguments lack objectivity   
   >   
   >The mighty Banana then spaketh these words:   
   >>Oh, so some monarchist idiot "writes" and I "retort", and you say my   
   >>arguments "lack objectivity". Did I ever say my arguments were   
   >>objective? Rest snipped.   
   >   
   >I think the word "retorted" admirably and objectively described your   
   >response to Breton's sensible point.  After all, a personal attack   
   >and a highly loaded question are not exactly accepted debating   
   >tactics.   
   >   
   >Nor is  quoting and responding only to the first five words of   
   >my message taken somewhat out of context - and then ignoring the   
   >remaining 98% of the message (269 words) with "Rest snipped".   
      
   Some idiot says everything Fellowes says is true.   
      
   You then weigh in to say 'bravo. Wow.   
      
   Your vocabulary's way ahead of your mentation.   
      
   Follow-ups set.   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)