XPost: alt.talk.royalty, alt.gossip.royalty   
   From: bpears@freenet.co.uk   
      
   >Some idiot says everything Fellowes says is true.   
   >   
   >You then weigh in to say 'bravo. Wow.   
   >   
   >Your vocabulary's way ahead of your mentation.   
   >   
   >Follow-ups set.   
      
   Given a choice between believing a direct statement from Lord   
   Fellowes or believing some hearsay evidence from an anonymous   
   source supposedly quoting an unnamed embassy radio operator,   
   how could anyone believe the latter?   
      
   Things might be different IF there was 1) evidence of foul play   
   in the death of Diana AND 2) evidence that Sir Robert, as he   
   then was, was involved in that foul play; but as there is   
   neither, there is no reason to doubt his word.   
      
   The bottom line is that Princess Diana died in an accidental   
   car crash so the whereabouts of this or that official at the   
   time is completely immaterial - details of who met whom in the   
   hours before the crash is completely immaterial - what rules   
   were broken in the hours after the crash is completely immaterial.   
   None of it has any bearing on the cause of the tragic crash which   
   is well known, very easy to understand and all too common - a   
   drunk behind the wheel.   
      
   --   
   Brian Pears   
   Gateshead, UK   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)