XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.media, uk.media.newspapers   
   XPost: alt.talk.royalty   
   From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article <1152136998.280776.15660@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
   =?iso-8859-1?B?SmFuIEL2aG1l?=  writes   
      
   >I Wuv Wubya skrev:   
   >   
   >> Jan Böhme wrote:   
   >   
   >> > So one would imagine that Diana's not wearing a seatbelt was necessary   
   >> > for her to die, and thus something that had to be arranged by the   
   >> > conspirators to ensure success.   
   >> >   
   >> > The only question which remains is: How did they manage to do this?   
   >>   
   >> Perhaps she habitually didn't wear a seatbelt.   
   >   
   >Perhaps indeed. But then she was a prime candidate for the Darwin   
   >Award, and no conspiracy would really be needed for her to get killed   
   >eventually.   
      
   Both she and Dodi Fayed knew people might be out to kill them. (Which is   
   on record in both cases).   
      
   She and he may have put their seatbelts on, and then unbuckled them so   
   as to get down into the footwell of the car when an armed threat arose   
   at the Place de la Concorde.   
      
   I take it you noted that Trevor Rees-Jones was not wearing a seatbelt,   
   but then he wouldn't anyway, because wearing one makes it more difficult   
   for a bodyguard to look round.   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)