XPost: uk.media, uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british   
   XPost: uk.media.newspapers   
   From: oO@oO.com   
      
   "banana"  wrote in message   
   news:Q7asGgAJiAuEFwbt@borve.demon.co.uk...   
   > In article <4hpj1hFlokvU1@individual.net>, oO  writes   
   >>   
   >>"banana"  wrote in message   
   >>news:WXytNKAlustEFwAs@borve.demon.co.uk...   
   >>> Today, 13 July 2006, the US govt vetoed a UN Security Council resolution   
   >>> condemning the Zionist assault on Gaza.   
   >>>   
   >>> Most instances of veto use for many years have been by the US, against   
   >>> international condemnation of Zionist actions.   
   >>>   
   >>> Let's see how many western newspapers mention this.   
   >>   
   >>I think many them covered this to be honest....(google search below). Was   
   >>having a look on the BBC's website and others though and couldn't find   
   >>anything. I think it is a case that many news outlets covered it but   
   >>haven't   
   >>exactlty flagged it up. Extremely difficult to find it out the Guardian's   
   >>site for example - but it is there (found via google). Out of 'site' out   
   >>of   
   >>mind?   
   >>   
   >>http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&ncl=http://t   
   estar.com.my/news   
   >>/story.asp%3Ffile%3D/2006/7/14/worldupdates/2006-07-14T032533Z   
   01_NOOTR_RTRJONC_   
   >>0_-259501-1%26sec%3DWorldupdates   
   >>   
   >>or   
   >>   
   >>http://tinyurl.co.uk/rxgm   
   >   
   > Did they cover just Thursday's use of the US veto, or the fact that most   
   > veto use for several years has been by the US to help Israel?   
      
   Rhetorical question ?   
      
   >The   
   > hardcopy 'Guardian' did just the former, in the last para of their   
   > front-page article, continued on page 2.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)