XPost: uk.misc, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc   
   XPost: uk.rec.sheds, alt.conspiracy   
   From: rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl   
      
   MI5.Victim@privacy.net wrote:   
      
   > On 16 Jul 2006 05:51:23 -0700, robertharvey@my-deja.com wrote:   
   >   
   > >MI5.Victim@privacy.net wrote:   
   > >> They did resume, which was why I posted.   
   > >   
   > >Atmospherics.  Play bloody hell with reception, tha knows.  And that   
   > >dam' aurora borealis...   
   >   
   > How about this for an offer they can't refuse. Leave me alone and stop   
   > the mindcontrol voices or I will start posting comments on the   
   > "Tomlinson v MI6" blog, which lots of people read and post to.   
      
   Gosh. For someone who is in constant contact with MI5, you really don't   
   understand this secret agent conspiracy theory thing, do you?   
      
   Look, the biggest enemy of any secret agency - such as 5 or 6 - is not   
   the secret service in the other camp at all. Oh, no. Nor is it   
   international terrorism, or organised crime, or even paranoid citizens   
   who spam Usenet. No, your biggest enemy if you're an agent is the guy   
   from the _other_ secret agency in your own camp.   
   Think about it. What happens when you kill all foreign agents? You're   
   out of a job. Get rid of the poor schmuck whose sartorial tastes run to   
   aluminium, and you've got rid of your own career. But make the other guy   
   look foolish... ah, now you've just put a dent in the reputation of your   
   greatest competitor for all that juicy government funding, and probably   
   made your own street cred go up a notch, too.   
      
   So you're threatening to expose MI_6_, and you expect MI_5_ to lift a   
   finger to stop you? Come off it! You're doing exactly what they want.   
   That's not a threat - that's an invitation to harrass you even more.   
      
   Richard   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)