XPost: alt.talk.royalty, alt.gossip.royalty   
   From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article <1153672911.041599.314620@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
   the_verminator@comcast.net  writes   
      
   >banana wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Surely you don't think that a deceased person's ex-spouse, and parent of   
   >> their grown-up children, should automatically be given 'interested   
   >> party' status at an inquest?   
      
   >Ah... but the time period covered by the inquest is not NOW; but   
   >then... and at THAT time the children were NOT grown up.   
      
   Don't be silly! They are 'interested parties' in their own right now.   
   Where does that leave someone who may have been such a party had the   
   interest been held several years ago, when they were children?   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)