XPost: alt.politics.british, uk.politics.misc, uk.media   
   XPost: uk.media.newspapers, alt.talk.royalty, alt.gossip.royalty   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, uk.legal   
   From: richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk   
      
   In message <4lttmgF3k9hrU1@individual.net>, oO  writes   
   >"Richard Miller"  wrote in message   
   >news:x8gEPuzOWZ+EFwOi@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...   
   >> In message <4ltf1gF3d6s6U1@individual.net>, oO  writes   
   >>>   
   >>>"Richard Miller"  wrote in message   
   >   
   >>>> For those of us within the legal profession, Lady Butler-Sloss is well   
   >>>> known and extremely highly respected as a knowledgeable, sympathetic   
   >>>> judge   
   >>>> with expertise, experience, good judgement and common sense.   
   >   
   >   
   >>>Yawn.   
   >   
   >> What a surprise. Bored by facts from people who know what they are talking   
   >> about.   
   >> Richard Miller   
   >   
   >I do apologise for my ignorance. Of course what would you expect from a   
   >lowly peon, a prole commoner like myself? Whereas you - you are a member of   
   >the legal profession! What was I thinking? I suppose I should've offered to   
   >get on my knees and kiss your ring after making the announcement.   
   >   
   >   
      
   No, but some explanation of what the fuck you are talking about might be   
   a start.   
      
   Are you saying that you do not agree that Lady Butler-Sloss is an   
   appropriate choice for the inquest? If so, on what basis are you saying   
   that? Is it on the basis of having more knowledge of her Ladyship than I   
   have, less knowledge, or none at all except what you have read in the   
   more paranoid newsgroups?   
   --   
   Richard Miller   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)