XPost: alt.politics.british, uk.politics.misc, uk.media   
   XPost: uk.media.newspapers, alt.talk.royalty, alt.gossip.royalty   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, uk.legal   
   From: richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk   
      
   In message ,   
   turtill@hotmail.com writes   
   >On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 19:36:10 +0100, Richard Miller   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>Are you saying that you do not agree that Lady Butler-Sloss is an   
   >>appropriate choice for the inquest? If so, on what basis are you saying   
   >>that? Is it on the basis of having more knowledge of her Ladyship than I   
   >>have, less knowledge, or none at all except what you have read in the   
   >>more paranoid newsgroups?   
   >   
   >Surely the issue is not what she is but what she is percieved to be? I   
   >really do not see how anybody could expect other than an outcry at her   
   >appointment regardless of how truthful she may be. Surely our lot can   
   >carry out a cover up better than this.   
   >pete   
   >   
      
   Do you mean that because a few conspiracy theorists get hold of the   
   wrong end of the stick about one of her very minor responsibilities, she   
   is not fit for the task?   
      
   To many such people, whoever was chosen they would find a way of   
   claiming it was a conspiracy.   
   --   
   Richard Miller   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)