XPost: alt.politics.british, uk.politics.misc, uk.media   
   XPost: uk.media.newspapers, alt.talk.royalty, alt.gossip.royalty   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, uk.legal   
   From: richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk   
      
   In message , Don Aitken   
    writes   
      
   >You haven't grasped the rules of the game. She was once involved in   
   >something with "security" in its name. That makes her part of the   
   >conspiracy. There are lots more rules of that kind, which ensure that   
   >*any* conceivable development or discovery provides further "proof" of   
   >an ever larger and scarier conspiracy, and that absolutely nothing at   
   >all can ever be accepted as evidence against that view. So it doesn't   
   >matter how much evidence anyone provides. The final and decisive proof   
   >that Dame Elizabeth is part of the conspiracy will come in due course,   
   >when she reports that there was no conspiracy; that would have been   
   >true whoever was the judge.   
      
   Ah, right. Thanks.   
      
   Presumably as I have now tried to justify her Ladyship, I am now also   
   part of the conspiracy.   
   --   
   Richard Miller   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)