XPost: alt.gossip.royalty, alt.talk.royalty
From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk
In article , banana writes
>In article , flaviaR@verizon.net writes
>>
>>On 7-Sep-2006, "LarrySlight" wrote:
>>
>>> > Right, so you can't even confront what the real reason for your
>>> > 'opinion' is. I thought as much.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > banana
>>>
>>> Good grief! Is there anyone on either of the 3 groups who can grasp
>>> how this "gentleman" reasons?
>>
>>Only in that he *doesn't*.
>>
>>> I think my original thought, to ignore
>>> these irrational writings, was correct.
>>
>>Yes, it was.
>
>'I lost friends of mine' and 'I saw some rubble' lead to the conclusion
>that 'the damage was caused by an American Airlines 757'.
>
>Because that's what he said.
...followed up with the argument that he was nearer to the Pentagon on
911 than I was. Presumably he won't take my word for it that the 7/7
terror attacks were an inside job though.
The guy is obviously lying to himself about why he 'thinks' what he
'thinks'. He 'thinks' it because the imperial American government told
him it on the media, and he assumes the said government would never lie
about something so big - and he has to perk up and type abuse onto his
keyboard in defence of the said government when someone says otherwise.
He may even deny that early big-media reports stated that bombs had
exploded in the basements of the twin towers. Go on, Larry, go for it!
--
banana "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you
give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to
Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the
rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
