XPost: alt.talk.royalty, alt.gossip.royalty   
   From: bpears@freenet.co.uk   
      
   rich  wrote:   
   >You know nothing about the report Brian because you haven't read it. On   
   >what page does it consider the collapse of building 7? Guess what? It   
   >isn't on any page because it isn't in it.   
   >AT ALL!   
      
   Don't patronize me you raving lunatic.  Why on earth would the   
   report consider the collapse of building 7? The report deals   
   with the background to and planning of the attack, the attack   
   itself, the political consequences of the attack and the lessons   
   which should be learned. The results of the attack - namely the   
   collapse of the buildings in New York, the damage to the Pentagon,   
   and the deaths of many good people - are self-evident to all but   
   a bunch of delusional nuts who live on a different planet from   
   the rest of us.   
      
   Why the various buildings collapsed as a result of the damage   
   inflicted is of interest to architects who will, we trust,   
   put up stronger structures in future. All that was of interest   
   to the Commission was what caused the damage leading to the   
   collapses, and this is covered in detail in Chapter 9 of their   
   Report. Their conclusion was that all the damage resulted from   
   hijacked airliners being flown into the buildings - and I've   
   not seen any credible evidence suggesting otherwise.   
      
   --   
   Brian Pears   
   Gateshead, UK   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)