XPost: uk.legal   
   From: nutteing@quickfindit.com   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:1159593449.196157.311270@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...   
   > The Todal wrote:   
   > > "Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )"   
   > >  wrote in message   
   > > news:4o1adgFcjr67U1@individual.net...   
   > > > Perhaps you can't defame a dead man.   
   > > > But a large component of the conspiracy   
   > > > is that there was good quality hotel CCTV imagery   
   > > > of Henri Paul soon before driving from the hotel.   
   > > > It shows him walking with perfectly normal gait down   
   > > > a corridor and most tellingly, moving out   
   > > > of the way of an oncoming person, and correcting his   
   > > > motion without the slightest wobble.   
   > >   
   > > No wonder they let him drive, then. He was one of those drunks who   
   manage to   
   > > sound and look quite sober. But afterwards the autopsy report showed a   
   high   
   > > level of blood alcohol which can only mean.... er... that the secret   
   police   
   > > tampered with the samples in order to support their colleagues at MI5.   
   >   
   > Have you not forgotten that the blood sample   
   > claimed to have been taken from Henri Paul   
   > also contained so much carbon monoxide that   
   > he would have been unable to stand, let alone   
   > walk or drive?   
   >   
   > I agree that it is unlikely to have been the result   
   > of tampering by MI5, the French secret service,   
   > Inspector Clouseau or anyone at all. Why should   
   > one believe in a conspiracy when the results can   
   > be adequately explained by simple incompetence?   
   >   
   > What I would like to know are the injuries   
   > suffered by the occupants of the motor-car,   
   > not from morbid fascination but to disprove   
   > the tale that, at the time of the crash, Diana   
   > was giving Dodi a 'Taylforth' and that she   
   > choked to death on the engorged member   
   > she had just bitten off in the impact.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > If you have been, are the marks still there?   
   >   
   > --   
   >  x   
   > /|\   
   >   
      
   I am aware of an academic whose specialism   
   is an expert in research and determination of   
   problems,flaws and damage to structural concrete.   
   He was in Paris at the time of the deaths and   
   for his own personal and professional interest he   
   inspected the damage to the pillars in the Parisian   
   underpass. In his expert opinion ,just the significant   
   damage only, was in-consistent with impact from a   
   Mercedes but is consistent with multiple   
   blows from a sledge-hammer.   
   An inference being, someone on the night,   
   decided there had to be evidence of a higher   
   speed collision. Or, of course, someone else   
   like himself, walking into   
   the underpass and bashing off some souvenirs -   
   you takes your pick or sledge.   
      
   ps   
   What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles   
   and what Special Branch don't want you to know.   
   http://nutteing.boom.ru/dnapr.htm   
   or nutteingd in a search engine.   
      
   Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)   
   Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -   
   it is defunct due to spam.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)