From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk
In article <1165866107.736223.274610@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
volcaran writes
>
>banana wrote:
>> In article <1165671753.531593.199670@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,
>> trevjon2@yahoo.com writes
>> >
>> >B. B. wrote:
>> >
>> >> Diana driver was 'drunk at wheel'
>> >> Press Association
>> >> Friday December 8, 2006 10:08 PM
>> >>
>> >
>> >(SNIP)
>> >
>> >How long before the first "It's all a cover-up/Government whitewash"
>> >post?
>>
>> Curious the BBC and Press Association aren't saying much about the
>> eyewitness evidence indicating Robert Fellowes was at the embassy, or
>> asking where SIS officers Langman and Spearman were that night, huh?
>
>What eyewitness evidence? Was this claim not made by someone who
>supposedly knew someone at the embassy?
The 'Daily Mail' said it "emerged through a third party" -
carefully-chosen words, no doubt, and open to interpretations different
from yours. The allegation is very relevant. Is Butler-Sloss pursuing
it? Who knows, maybe the person is very willing to give evidence.
On a weekend's leave in Norfolk, with his wife? Or in Paris that night?
Will the question be asked in open court? Will witnesses who want to
corroborate it or dispute it be sought out, and have their evidence
tested in open court?
If Fellowes can be shown to have been at the embassy that night, it's a
smoking gun.
What about the phone records from Balmoral? After all, Stevens - and
presumably Butler-Sloss now that Burgess has walked out - are seeking to
'leave no stone unturned'. Why not do it in public rather than let
people take the baron and baroness's word for it?
>As regards SIS officers the BBC
>did report that Stevens looked at the claim and found it to be untrue
Curiously one of the men - presumably the known torturer Langman - is
said to claim that he was on a 'weekend trip' to Greece, while the other
- presumably Spearman - admits he was in France but says he was in the
southwest (i.e. as far away from Paris as possible, without leaving the
mainland) with his wife and her family.
Jurors should of course be advised that when a family member gives
evidence which might help keep someone out of the dock on a murder
charge, they may feel that family ties are more important than telling
the truth. You gotta wonder whether the next thing we'll hear is that
Robin Janvrin had to go to bed early that night, having taken sleeping
pills owing to toothache (or maybe haemorrhoids - that'll do nicely in
the press), or some such ailment. Therefore he couldn't possibly have
had anything to do with telephone calls prior to, say, 6 am.
What a coincidence, that both Langman and Spearman say they were away
from the embassy for a while, and only returned after Princess Diana's
body was put on the aircraft for England.
What was the Chief of Staff to the SIS Director of Operations doing in
Paris at all?
>so no doubt it will be covered in his report. Has there ever been any
>claim that they were in Paris apart from Tomlinson (hardly an
>independent source ever since he accepted Fayed's shilling)?
Personally I have never been sold on his idea that Henri Paul's main
loyalty was to SIS. The guy sitting next to HP, however, may have been
open to helping out in an operation led by that party when push came to
shove. Meanwhile it's remarkable that no backup was given from the
backup vehicle.
--
banana "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you
give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to
Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the
rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
