From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article <1165884726.709916.91970@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com>,   
   volcaran  writes   
      
   >banana wrote:   
   >> In article <1165866107.736223.274610@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
   >> volcaran  writes   
   >> >   
   >> >banana wrote:   
   >> >> In article <1165671753.531593.199670@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,   
   >> >> trevjon2@yahoo.com writes   
      
      
      
   >>The allegation is very relevant. Is Butler-Sloss pursuing   
   >> it? Who knows, maybe the person is very willing to give evidence.   
   >   
   >And who is to say the matter has not/is not being considered. No doubt   
   >"Mr X" will be falling over himself to do so despite it taking 9 years   
   >for "him" to "emerge it" through a third party.   
      
   He may have been scared, from knowing too much. Who wouldn't be?   
      
   A similar point to yours might be made about Langman and Spearman who   
   hardly fell over themselves to deny the charges, which were first made   
   in 1999.   
      
   Personally I would like the embassy communications worker and the SIS   
   officers to give evidence at the inquests and to be open to   
   cross-examination by the next of kin of the deceased, or by lawyers   
   acting for them. Richard Tomlinson may perhaps also be willing to give   
   evidence from outside of the UK, the same way George Blake did in the   
   trial of Michael Randle and Pat Pottle.   
      
   Is video film from the embassy available, or are they going to claim   
   privilege under the Vienna Convention?   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)