From: ron_winn@lineone.net   
      
   "cromwell"  wrote in message   
   news:H-CdnfqOrMJiWhjYRVnyuQA@bt.com...   
   >   
   > "ron_winn"  wrote in message   
   > news:4585b1c7$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...   
   > > Skippy, no lost coolant and engine oil?   
   >   
   > Yes there were.   
   >   
   > See Paget,   
   >   
   > "Hubert Pourceau was a member of the Bureau Central des Accidents,   
   BCA. At   
   > around 8am, as per standard French practice, he attended the scene   
   to   
   > confirm the findings made during the night by his BCA colleagues and   
   amend   
   > the plan accordingly with anything that may have been missed and   
   that was   
   > now visible in the daylight.  On his arrival there, he noticed that   
   cleaning   
   > services were present and that there was still some oil on the   
   westbound   
   > carriageway where the Mercedes had come to a halt. He cannot comment   
   on   
   > whether that carriageway had been re-opened earlier, before 8am, but   
   he felt   
   > it was unlikely."(Page 603)   
      
   None at the impact site i.e. near the pillar? That seems odd. I   
   believe skippy insinuated that the car was planted in the tunnel and   
   the crash didn't happen there. That's the only reason for no fluids.   
   But of course he can only mean where it came to rest because that's   
   the scene shown in the pics of the car.   
   >   
   > What did the original poster say,   
   >   
   > "Can anybody explain to me the lack of any visible fluids from the   
   > car wreck in the tunnel? I have seen many pictures of the car after   
   the   
   > crash and have yet to see any leaking fluid or signs of oil etc."   
   >   
   > 'Visible' here refers to photographs.   
   >   
   >  No skid marks according to the   
   > > report.   
   >   
   > Not skid marks but yaw marks yes.   
      
   Were they yaw marks or skid marks shown in the Scott Macleod book?   
   Were they marks leading to the pillar or leading off the pillar?   
      
   >   
   >  Of course Stevens team would have got a drawing of the   
   > > skidmarks from the French dossier but the report states no skid   
   marks.   
   >   
   > That's because the diagrams from the French investigation(shown in   
   the   
   > Conspiracy Files and Martyn Gregory's documentary) show yaw marks.   
   >   
   > > Nothing much stated about the forensics carried out on on the   
   pillar   
   > > either, although the kerb is mentioned forensically in the report.   
   Do   
   > > you think that car spun off once after that impact?   
   >   
   > There are various photo's of the wrecked vehicle.  There are various   
   photo's   
   > of people standing around the wrecked vehicle.  The damage was   
   extensive   
   > caused by an impact at high speed.  Vehicles can not run without   
   brake   
   > fluid, oil, water, gasoline et al.  It would be amazing if none of   
   this   
   > leaked as a result of the accident therefore, they were present at   
   the   
   > scene.   
   >   
   > Geoff.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)