XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.talk.royalty, alt.gossip.royalty   
   XPost: uk.media   
   From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article <1168561906.700778.313360@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,   
   volcaran  writes   
      
   >banana wrote:   
   >> In article <1168550830.514797.13110@i56g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,   
   >> Breton  writes   
   >>   
   >> >banana wrote:   
      
      
      
   >Brenda Wells said nothing that was inconsistent with the known events   
   >of a Merc chased by motorbikes.   
      
   Do you really think paps' motorbikes were waiting at the slip road? If   
   so, what are the paps' names? Note that there is zero evidence to   
   support the idea that the people on the motorbikes were paparazzi.   
      
   >It is only you and your fellow   
   >travellers reading more into it.   
      
   How do you know everything she said?   
      
   And the reason you think it's OK for her evidence not to be mentioned in   
   Stevens's report is...?   
      
   And what about Richard Dearlove - why's he not mentioned?   
      
   And what about the allegation that the 'queen's' private secretary   
   Robert Fellowes was at the embassy? Stevens does mention this, and   
   implies there is evidence to the contrary. Right, so will this evidence   
   be tested in court, and witnesses who give it be allowed to be cross-   
   examined, or not?   
      
   If a witness is willing to give evidence to Stevens, but is not willing   
   to give it in open court, that obviously raises questions regarding the   
   reliability of their evidence.   
      
   If I were MAF's counsel, I would urge the jurors (if a jury is   
   appointed) to be sceptical about any so-called evidence that they do not   
   actually see and hear a witness give, in front of their own eyes and   
   ears - a procedure which, as I am sure you know, allows jurors   
   themselves to question a witness if they so wish. Let them watch Robert   
   Fellowes, Richard Spearman, 'Prince' Philip Glucksburg, torturer   
   Nicholas Langman, etc., and judge for themselves whether these scumbags   
   are telling the truth or lying. Let them hear Fellowes's relatives say   
   he was in England with them, and ditto.   
      
   Brown-nosers like Mark Lawson and Mick Hume may say it's all over, but   
   it's hardly started!   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)