XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.talk.royalty, uk.media
From: abelard3@abelard.org
On 16 Jan 2007 00:53:38 -0800, joblard@hushmail.com
typed:
>abelard wrote:
>
>> On 15 Jan 2007 15:23:33 -0800, "Mel Rowing"
>>
>> typed:
>[..]
>> >
>> >One other thing regarding the Coroners court, is that since it carries
>> >out an inquiry rather than judges a 'case'. The 'case' is never closed.
>> >An inquest can always be reopened should new evidence merit it.
>>
>> you seem oblivious to the public perception....
>>
>> if public perception didn't matter...or even as it does....this exercise
>> is worse than pointless...
>
>Let's face it, the only result that would satisfy the likes of banana
>and MAF is a verdict that Diana was murdered by the intelligence
>services on the orders of the 'Royal' family. Any other outcome would
>'clearly' be the result of a cover-up.
i don't think that is the point...
>As for 'public perception' I would wager that the vast majority of the
>public couldn't give a twopenny fart about the issue..
the level of fossil media attention does not bear that out..
it may be what some *wish* were the case
regards...
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
