From: ron_winn@lineone.net   
      
   Why is it that the phrase not "a shred of evidence", which is a term   
   denoting all encompassing and having a wide scope, used before the inquest   
   and as if every detail is known about the case.   
      
   Has Trevor remembered why they were in the tunnel. Has he remembered being   
   annoyed at Paul's cigar smoke all day and that Diana was complaining too.   
   Have they discovered where Paul was when it is said he was missing?   
   Is there a full forensic report on the pillar?   
   Has it been explained why the tunnel had to be washed out? Was there blood   
   patches inside the tunnel on the road? Why the major cleaning job?   
   Any skid marks in the tunnel?   
   I'm sure many other questions can be raised.   
   Can we therefore assume that all the pertinent issues are fully known?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)