From: ron_winn@lineone.net   
      
   That's odd. In an earlier post I pointed out two pictures of the rear of the   
   car appearing in the The Times with names of the guys in each picture.   
   The Sun of 3/10 had the same sort of format. Names of the guys standing   
   around in the tunnel. What are they seen doing one could ask. Well, they are   
   just standing around. Not an ambulance is in sight.   
      
   Anyway, one of the pics shows the pillar with a large piece of oily wreckage   
   [could be anything though] lying across the raised island and the end   
   dropping over the side of the kerb into the other lane [the tunnel in the   
   opposite direction. This thing is to the right of the pillar [nearest the   
   camera] and the pic is taken from this opposite lane. The Merc is in the   
   other lane [further from the camera] on the other side of the pillars. So   
   the cameraman chose to take this pic from behind it - not the side that was   
   hit.   
      
   The second pic is taken in the side of the tunnel with the car in it and   
   shows the side of the pillar that was hit. This thing can be seen with the   
   end dropping over the side of the kerb into this lane. It is now on the left   
   of the pillar, as it should be but the end is dropping over the side of the   
   kerb into this lane. The paint is seen damaged or missing from both sides of   
   this pillar. {Are all pillars like this around their base facing the   
   traffic?].   
      
   If this is confusing then read on - for a car to have been traveling at   
   60-65 mph to have bounced off a pillar and done a 180 degree turn you would   
   expect to be further away from the pillar. This car isn't - it is almost   
   adjacent to it.   
      
   Anyway, I guess we have all seen the size of the gap between the pillars in   
   the newspaper pictures or you might even have been in the tunnel. Very wide   
   wouldn't you say.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)