From: ron_winn@lineone.net   
      
   So Trevor did have a seat belt. Or did he? Has it been decided he was   
   wearing his seat belt to have survived that collision? Just look at the   
   damage to that car. Would he have come out of it alive had he not been   
   wearing his seat belt? I think it was decided he had to be wearing it   
   despite it being contrary to bodyguard practice of not being free &   
   unrestricted in movement in town driving. I recall Geoff Cromwell was   
   adamant he was not wearing a seat belt. I think Geoff was right to contest   
   it. How long had they been away from the city? It was only minutes inside   
   the tunnel so when did Trevor get this urge to put on his seat belt? I don't   
   think the circumstances were such that required a seat belt and if those   
   circumstances arose after entering the tunnel then there was not the time to   
   find it, extend it or anchor it.   
      
   But let's face it there wasn't going to be a finding that PP or MI6 or   
   anyone else of the ilk did it. Not when it was a matter of National Security   
   and/or the bringing down of the British Empire. The scandal of a drunk   
   driver and all the other little scandals [no seat belts - paps harrassment   
   of the car - speeding etc]  in comparison to what these major scandals would   
   mean, well it wasn't never to be. Still think it was a shaped charge inside   
   the car that created the "collision" damage. That would account for Trevor   
   surviving the "impact" and account for the ease with which he can maintain   
   amnesia free of conscience. Did Diana's pulmonary vein tear [a decelaration   
   injury] and yet Trevor survive any such injury? Why did Diana survive the   
   crash and Dodi didn't?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)