XPost: alt.religion.christian.last-days, alt.religion.end-times.prophecies,   
   nyc.politics   
   XPost: ny.politics   
   From: adykes@panix.com   
      
   Your facts and math and conclusions are still wrong. See below for   
   specifics.   
      
      
   In article ,   
   Freedom Man  wrote:   
   >"Liberals are Loony"  wrote in   
   >message news:einr86l5ik52s3lo38n06eq0uelsemsl4g@4ax.com...   
   >> How To Destroy a 9/11 Truther   
   >   
   >< snip >   
   >   
   >The right-wing fascist conspirator-traitors behind 9/11, which at the very   
   >least was deliberately allowed to happen, will say and do anything to cover   
   >up the truth and cover their asses. They are guilty at the very least of   
   >criminal negligence, and most likely of the mass-murder of thousands of   
   >innocent American citizens. It is they, not those exposing their crime of   
   >the century, that deserve destruction.   
   >   
   >NINE-ELEVEN - NEVER AGAIN!   
   >   
   >To understand the point I wish to make, let's assume that an obviously alien   
   >creature was walking peacefully down the street, and observe peoples'   
   >reactions to it.   
   >   
   >Some would simply not see it! Their brains would reject as IMPOSSIBLE what   
   >their eyes tell them, and block out their awareness of the unearthly   
   >creature.   
   >   
   >Some might stare, perhaps be shocked or frightened, but then go on,   
   >rationalizing that they only saw someone in costume, or that they had   
   >indulged too heavily at last night's party and were seeing things. They   
   >would tell no one what they saw for fear of being called crazy. They would   
   >even, in defense of their own rationalization, label other people that   
   >reported such a sighting crazy. This is the psychological phenomenon of   
   >DENIAL.   
   >   
   >Perhaps in fear for their own sanity, deniers condemn as crazy others that   
   >claim aliens or whatever to be real. Such assertions are frightening because   
   >they violate their sense of reality - "only KOOKS believe in aliens!" Thus   
   >people tend to reject as unreal what is not comfortable for them to accept,   
   >and likewise embrace beliefs that do not hold up to scientific scrutiny but   
   >do provide them comfort. You don't believe what you DON'T WANT to believe;   
   >denial thus serves to protect the mind from what would be mentally traumatic   
   >if accepted.   
   >   
   >Some things are simply too horrific, too abominably appalling, too greatly   
   >in violation of what we WANT to think or believe, to accept as actual   
   >reality - even when they ARE real! "Look; the Emperor wears no clothes,"   
   >said the child too naïve to know that such facts are not to be spoken of,   
   >nor even acknowledged to oneself.   
   >   
   >PSYOPS - definition paraphrased from Wikipedia:  Psychological Operations.   
   >Techniques used to influence a target audience's value systems, beliefs,   
   >emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. PSYOPS are used to induce   
   >confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the   
   >originator's objectives, and are sometimes combined with black operations or   
   >false flag tactics. The phrase is commonly used by governments who wish to   
   >avoid the terms propaganda and brainwashing in reference to their own work   
   >because those terms have negative connotations. The use of such euphemisms   
   >for what is in effect mind control is itself an example of psychological   
   >operations, i.e. using psychological techniques to persuade a large number   
   >of people to support something they wouldn't normally support or to   
   >unquestioningly accept lies.   
   >   
   >Obviously, to permit or commit an atrocity on the scale of the 9/11 attacks,   
   >and/or to exploit the horror, shock, and fear thus created to influence   
   >public opinion and actions, is clearly a PSYOP. The exploitation of the   
   >psychological phenomenon of DENIAL is also clearly a PSYOP. Who would want   
   >to believe that traitors in our own government would permit, or even   
   >perpetrate, such an atrocity on their own people? How much easier it would   
   >be to accept the existence of aliens - or fanatical Jihadists!   
   >   
   >"But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy   
   >and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a   
   >democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist   
   >dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the   
   >bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they   
   >are being attacked and then denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism   
   >and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." -   
   >Hermann Goering at the Nuremberg Trials.   
   >   
   >Now that we understand what PSYOPS are, and the psychological phenomenon of   
   >DENIAL, we are in a better position to rationally investigate the true   
   >nature and possible sources of the 9/11 attacks.   
   >   
   >The UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE of an INSIDE JOB:   
   >   
   >BLOWN TO BITS:   
   >   
   >The sudden, complete, straight down at near free fall speed collapse of   
   >steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes, is the   
   >SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy. The building's minor fires and debris   
   >damage could not account for this collapse, which had all the earmarks of   
   >controlled demolition by explosives. Videos clearly show this. Such   
   >demolitions take many days or weeks to set up - not the few hours between   
   >the attacks and the collapse. The explosives therefore had to be put in   
   >place BEFOREHAND. This lends credibility to the use of previously placed   
   >explosives to bring down the towers as well, which like the badly damaged   
   >and fire-gutted Deutchbank building would probably have remained standing.   
   >   
   >Propaganda shills, disinformationists, and those in psychological denial   
   >still insist the collapse of WTC 7 could not be what it obviously was, and   
   >they employ often ludicrous rationalizations and fabrications, elaborate   
   >lies, and infantile ad-hominem attacks to defend their indefensible   
   >position. The REAL terrorists are desperate to cover up their mass-murderous   
   >crime of the century - the permitting if not perpetration of, and subsequent   
   >political and economic exploitation of the fully preventable 9/11 disaster.   
   >Could Bin Laden have somehow totally incapacitated NORAD - the world's most   
   >sophisticated aerospace defense system - on that horrible morning? I don't   
   >think so!   
   >   
   >There is evidence of an INSIDE JOB even more clear and indisputable than the   
   >explosive demolition collapse of building 7 and the standing down of NORAD.   
   >Many very small HUMAN BODY FRAGMENTS have been found on the roofs of nearby   
   >buildings. These were too far away to be from jumpers from the towers. If   
   >the towers simply collapsed from damage and fire alone, what blew these   
   >bodies to smithereens and sent the fragments flying for considerable   
   >distances? The plane impacts did not have the explosive brisance (shattering   
   >force) necessary to do this - only HIGH EXPLOSIVES can blow bodies to tiny   
   >bits and throw them such distances.   
   >   
   >So - who can credibly account for these body fragments, other than their   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)