From: azmodiuss@yahoo.com   
      
   Tell me conclusively which it is...a particle or a wave?   
   Science has just begun to discover that in subatomic scales, the only way to   
   "guess" where or how hot something is to use a probability scale... to   
   "guess". The science of subatomic physics has just recently discovered that   
   it must be subjective to achieve any results what-so-ever... so shouldn't we   
   lighten up a little with the "It can't be","The only way"  and "It must be"   
   language?   
      
   "Christian Task"  wrote in message   
   news:3f549cee$0$6528$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...   
   > "CAndersen (Kimba)"  wrote in message   
   > news:cpi6lvce05dbab8nrqrek6bq1kc9n91sj2@4ax.com...   
   > > "Christian Task"  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > the NDE is only the brain's way of coping woth a stressful event   
   > >   
   > > That is a favorite doctrine of the "science"-believing pseudoskeptic,   
   but   
   > > it makes absolutely no sense from the scientific point of view.   
   >   
   > What makes sense then? Even if the OOBE, NDE, reincarnation scenario is   
   > correct, and I'm not saying conclusively that it is not, we still have the   
   > problem of continuity of existence. This existence is the only one I know   
   > and if I die, go into an afterlife state and come back again, it's just   
   the   
   > same as being extinguished forever. I can't remember any life other than   
   > this one, so what's the point? Eternal oblivion would feel exactly the   
   same.   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)