XPost: sci.psychology.psychotherapy, alt.consciousness, talk.origins   
   From: sfct@aol.com   
      
   Von Smith wrote:   
   >   
   > olive wrote in message news:<41218DE2.29A4@aol.com>...   
   > > Raan wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > The fact of the constancy of the speed of light had been experimentally   
   > > > proven beyond a reasonable doubt. It was the explanation for it that was   
   > > > lacking until Einstein came up with one. The relation by analogy to   
   > > > apparent psychic events is marginal owing to the lack of any factual   
   > > > evidence and the subjective interpretations that color the perceptions   
   being   
   > > > reported. The fellow with the magnetic field helmet was at least getting   
   > > > closer to establishing experimental fact. If you want to think you are   
   > > > being scientific then remember that all good scientists are above all   
   else   
   > > > skeptics.   
   > > > --   
   > > > >>   
   > > >   
   > > > "rogerst" wrote in message news:40E498A2.3   
   DB@yahoo.com...   
   > > > > Actually you guys there is someone famous in math, generally not read I   
   > > > > know, who experienced the white light, BUT WHEN HE DIED, but when   
   > > > > somebody much more famous than him died. Let me repeat it as I did at   
   my   
   > > > > site here : read past the short build-up.   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > > During the turn of the century some scientists conducted experiments   
   > > > > hoping to discover the speed of light. Of course, it would be the same   
   > > > > as sound, only much faster. They weren't looking for anything more,   
   > > > > anything strange. But STRANGE CAME CALLING! They discovered the speed   
   of   
   > > > > light had the same speed no matter what the reference. Now anyone with   
   > > > > an understanding of physics knew that was impossible. And where was   
   that   
   > > > > damm ether they just knew had to permeate all space??   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Speed of Light was a constant- no matter what reference? Shouldn't be,   
   > > > > but was. No ether, but light was a wave, every wave needed a medium to   
   > > > > travel through, so ether had to exist..but DIDN'T. Another shouldn't   
   be.   
   > > > > But there was an over-educated little Jewish patent clerk. Poor   
   student,   
   > > > > low grades. Destined for failure. Why? Just ask any of his teachers.   
   > > > > They would tell you just why he was just a patent clerk.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > And he was smart enough to accept a weird universe with impossible   
   laws.   
   > > > > Like the speed of light being a constant. Some of the others were too   
   > > > > busy trying to figure out what went wrong with the experiment. But he   
   > > > > persisted and there went E=M * C-squared. All because he accepted what   
   > > > > others COULDN'T.   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Now today, it is the same today with another observation. One which   
   > > > > can't be repeated. One which has to be taken on faith. But one, if it   
   > > > > pans out will open another new door. One other point before I forget.   
   So   
   > > > > like me these days. The people who debunk NDEs, claiming to explain it   
   > > > > away with brain chemistry gone wild in a dying brain, neglecting NDErs   
   > > > > seem to come back when they are told to come back, neglect they were   
   not   
   > > > > in a state of denial, but thought themselves dead, neglect the state   
   > > > > wasn't chaotic, but with crystal clarity, neglect the odds of many   
   > > > > people having the same exact experience, neglect that NDEs see only   
   only   
   > > > > dead, not live people, and neglect they don't know what they are   
   talking   
   > > > > about.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > BUT HERE IS ONE THEY CAN"T EXPLAIN!   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Rudy Rucker was a student studying mathematics at Rutgers in the 1970s.   
   > > > > Set theory. But let him tell it from his book, Infinity and the Mind.   
   It   
   > > > > is no New Age book, its a book on set theory. But in it, he took time   
   > > > > out to explain his own experience with Godel.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > He had the rare opportunity to meet and talk math with Godel. That is   
   > > > > like discussing physics with Einstein. Godel was a giant in   
   mathematics.   
   > > > > It was a rare privilege. Godel was at the time living at Princeton   
   > > > > University.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Well, let me get back to Rudy.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > You see, when someone experiences a NDE, you can makes claims about   
   > > > > their dying brain. But what about a healthy young mathematician who   
   > > > > experienced the white light, not when he was dying, but when someone   
   > > > > else was dying. This is your......damm light travels at the same speed   
   > > > > no matter what, but this time in dreams and that famous White Light.   
   > > > > Metaphysics, not physics. With the metaphysical realm deeper into   
   > > > > reality. No surprise. Now if you accept it and try to explain   
   > > > > it..ahhh...new insights.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Play a modern Einstein.   
   > > > > But this time its a mental light you're trying to understand.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Rudy, "I dreamed I was at his bedside. There was a chessboard on the   
   > > > > covers on front of him. Godel reached his hand out and knocked the   
   board   
   > > > > over, tipping the men onto the floor. The chessboard expanded into an   
   > > > > infinite mathematical plane. And then that, too, vanished. There was a   
   > > > > brief play of symbols, and then emptiness-an emptiness flooded with   
   even   
   > > > > white light. The next day I learned Kurt Godel was dead."   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Well? PLAY EINSTEIN AND FIGURE IT OUT!   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Can you figure out what Kurt Godel was telling Rudy Rucker about the   
   > > > > nature of   
   > > > > reality?   
   > > > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Raan you didn't understand the post at all, did you? It wasn't about the   
   > > speed of light, but about learning to accept what seems to be the   
   > > impossible when you're forced to face new objective facts. Einstein   
   > > understood the lesson, you can't, even when it is pointed out to you by   
   > > another.   
   > >   
   > > Rudy was a young Phd. student in excellant health when he had his NDE   
   > > dream about Godel dying that night. His young brain was in excellant   
   > > shape with no reason for having any dream about Godel's death or the   
   > > white light in it. GET THE POINT? It was easy enough for me.   
   >   
   > I haven't been following this thread for long, but when did NDEs   
   > become expanded to include any dream that includes an element of white   
   > light? By that standard I have had a few NDEs myself.   
   > And I don't see in the passage you quote where Rudy had a dream about   
   > Goedel dying. He had a dream about him knocking over a chessboard.   
   > I'm sure if Goedel had gotten better, Rudy could have decided   
   > afterwords that the dream was somehow a premonition of that, too.   
   >   
   > Von Smith   
   > Fortuna nimis dat multis, satis nulli.   
      
      
      
   ****************************************************************   
   ****************************************************************   
   ****************   
      
    Von Smith huh? I bet.   
      
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|