XPost: alt.dreams.lucid, alt.out-of-body   
   From: suzych@swcp.com   
      
   In article <4131e0f7_2@newspeer2.tds.net>, "Dick Silk"   
    wrote:   
      
   > "Laura"  wrote in message   
   > news:cgpjb8$2nbs$4@news.cybercity.dk...   
   > someone wrote:   
   > >> my mind wants to say the false awakenings - were the   
   > >> [psychophysiology]   
   > >> reving itself up --- kinda like fetal movements ... even lung   
   > >> movements -   
   > >> it is not life and consciousness -- it is just the muscles moving and   
   > >> developing with the bones so that when it pops out - God can make it   
   > >> come   
   > >> alive .. otherwise it stays dead and is a still born.  My God dont   
   > >> kill   
   > >> unborn children ... and my God dont screw around either.   
   >   
   > > Isn't that contradictory? I mean, if life starts at birth, then how can   
   > > an   
   > > unborn child possibly be killed?  Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your   
   > > point?   
   >   
   > Anything that has life can be killed.  Anything that is GROWING has life   
   > [including bacteria].  An unborn child has life.   
      
   So does a snail on the path.  So what?  Nature is prodigal, with life   
   and with death.  That's one of the lessons of incarnation.   
   --   
   Crow   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)