home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.consciousness.near-death-exp      Discussions of cheating the grim reaper      2,497 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 594 of 2,497   
   Raan to Uncle Davey   
   Re: Council for Secular Humanism (1/2)   
   10 Sep 04 00:16:22   
   
   XPost: sci.psychology.psychotherapy, alt.consciousness, talk.origins   
   From: RaanOne@One.org   
      
   "Uncle Davey"  wrote in message   
   news:chqlvd$ub0$0@pita.alt.net...   
   >   
   > Użytkownik "AC"  napisał w wiadomości   
   > news:slrncjv1bi.2b6.mightymartianca@aaronclausen.alberni.net...   
   > > On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 20:37:48 +0000 (UTC),   
   > > Uncle Davey via Google  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > But there are those who have persecuted believers in the past and they   
   > > > will do so again in the future.   
   > >   
   > > And there are those that have persecuted non-believers.   
   > >   
   > > > It is written "all those who would   
   > > > live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution".   
   > >   
   > > Except that there have been periods of history where those that did not   
   > > believe Jesus was God and the savior where themselves persecuted   
   against.   
   > > Even now, an atheist in the United States. no matter how honorable or   
   > > qualified, could achieve any high office.  Worse, some good Christian   
   folk   
   > > might even think him unAmerican, a threat to their religion and   
   > potentially   
   > > even a traitor, simply because he does not accept the existence of the   
   > God   
   > > of Abraham.   
   > >   
   > > >In the near   
   > > > future I plan, God willing to digitalise some recordings I made near   
   > > > the end of the Soviet Union when I was priviledged to be helping some   
   > > > very persecuted brethren and put them on my website.   
   > >   
   > > As long as you give equal time to the people brutalized by Christian   
   > > fundementalists.   
   >   
   > I don't know any of those personally, but if you give me a verifiable   
   > recording I'll put it up.   
   >   
   > >   
   > > I'm not attacking Christianity, I'm attacking a mindset that refuses all   
   > > compromise, that not only claim that they are right, but that are   
   willing   
   > to   
   > > suppress those that disagree.   
   > >   
   > > The Soviet Union was one country, twisted by power-hungry men seeking to   
   > > break the old ties to the equally dictatorial Czars (who, ironically,   
   were   
   > > among the last monarchs to proclaim their divine right to rule from the   
   > God   
   > > of Abraham).  It wasn't atheism that drove them, but rather the need to   
   > cut   
   > > away the symbolism of the old Christian Russia. Atheism was a political   
   > > tool, which I don't think you'd find many atheists today approving of.   
   >   
   > The guy you were speaking to would and the guy who first suggested I go   
   and   
   > get my ass kicked at t.o. seemed to.   
   >   
   > >   
   > > The Soviet Union attempted to replace religion with party doctrine.  It   
   > > created a cult of personality around Lenin, changing him from   
   > Revolutionary   
   > > leader into an ideological saint, treated with the same reverence that   
   > > Christian saints before had been.  That is not my idea of a secular   
   > society,   
   > > but rather one where one religion was simply swapped for another.  Where   
   > the   
   > > Christian religion in Russia was wound around the Bible, saints and the   
   > > power of the Orthodox Church, the new religion was wound around Marx's   
   > > writings, the Communist Party and the culthood of Lenin (and later, the   
   > > temporary deification of Stalin).   
   > >   
   > > The same pattern was seen in China, where the Maoists attempted to make   
   a   
   > > clean break from Chinese tradition, particularly Confucisism.  Sadly, I   
   > > think the Maoists may have been more successful and destroying China's   
   > > heritage than the Leninists and Stalinists were in Russia.   
   > >   
   > > My idea of a secular society is one where freedom of worship is   
   > guaranteed,   
   > > where every faith is treated equally, and where government governs for   
   all   
   > > the people, and without faovritism towards any one faith or sect   
   therein.   
   > > It does not intrude religious beliefs into the activities of government.   
   > > The government should be blind to whether one is a Catholic, Methodist,   
   > > Muslim, Jew, Wiccan or atheist, and yet all of these, and the entire   
   > > spectrum of beliefs, should be tolerated.  In such a society, it may   
   mean   
   > > that certain religous-based moral codes may be violated by notions of   
   > > abortion, euthanasia and gay marriage, but those religious people will   
   > > understand that such a society also protects their beliefs and their   
   faith   
   > > from the interference of the state.   
   > >   
   > > I'm not asking you to agree with my atheism, Davey, nor am I demanding   
   > that   
   > > your church approve of abortion, euthanasia or homosexual marriages.   
   I'm   
   > > asking that you ponder a society where every man is allowed to decide   
   > these   
   > > things on his own, or in a group that he freely follows, without   
   official   
   > > encumbrance from any branch or representative of government.  Let your   
   > > conscience rule your own actions, but don't seek to let it rule the   
   > actions   
   > > of others, and let any morals or ethics to be accepted by society in   
   > general   
   > > be governed by the principles of basic individual freedoms.   
   > >   
   > > That's what I mean when I reject fundementalism, or any movement by any   
   > > individual or group to enforce their own beliefs or lack of beliefs upon   
   > > other people.  Though I would fight to my last breath to prevent your   
   > > omphalism or your Calvinism from being taught in public schools in my   
   > > country or to be given government favor or sanction, by the same token   
   I'd   
   > > fight against any Secular Humanist who attempted to stop you from   
   publicly   
   > > declaring your beliefs.   
   > >   
   >   
   > As you know I am not fighting to have religious themes brought into   
   schools   
   > anyway, as these are for Church and family.   
   >   
   > I believe in the free market of ideas, and therefore I have said all along   
   > that all should be free to put forward their ideas.   
   >   
   > Homosexuals who wish to live together ought to be given the same tax   
   breaks   
   > if any apply as heterosexuals, since I am not after their money, and the   
   > same benefits with regard to inheritance, quiet enjoyment of their   
   property,   
   > etc. But they should not be allowed to propagandise their views in schools   
   > either, and I am fed up of having homosexuality crammed down my throat on   
   > almost every programme made and shown by the BBC. Also I am not happy at   
   > allowing public toilets to become places where I have to confront these   
   > people cruising around when all I want is a dump or a piss. I just don't   
   > like it, that's all. I've had to put up with the occasional attempt at me   
   by   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca