XPost: talk.religion.course-miracle, alt.support.chronic-pain, misc.writing
From: pirnog@aol.com
"CAndersen (Kimba)" wrote in message
news:1095688155.NcBOnGzXXrxcHKXXe3Rx4w@teranews...
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:49:11 GMT, "Noggin" wrote:
>
> >> Not at all. All the contempt here is coming from you.
> >
> >Contempt for what? Be specific, it's the respectful thing to do.
>
> How about "speeeeeeeeritchual" for a start?
Yes, it is amazingly contemptuous for anyone to describe themselves as such, I
fully agree.
That's why I enjoy mentioning it. It's called fighting fire with fire.
Speeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeritchual people don't like that much, and that's a good
thing.
>
> >Ahhhh..the old mind reading diversion. You know my level of interest after
what, 2 posts?
How
> >do you manage that trick?
>
> I can't read minds. But I can read. And you've made more than 2 posts.
Ok, so what is my level of interest then? Please be specific, it's the
respectful thing to do.
>
> >What do you get out of trying to prove how "speeeeeeeeritchual" you are
anyway? No one ever
has
> >an answer for that.
>
> Maybe it's because you're not interested in actually having a conversation.
Or maybe not. Are you suggesting that we should operate from the perspective
of your "maybe",
rather than the demonstrated facts?
> If you were, maybe you'd find out that my position is that life is
> spiritual. I never claim there's anything special about me.
Oh, ok then, it's my position that theirs only one reason to fling around the
word
"speeeeeeeeeeeeritchual" and that is for the purpose of making oneself special
and therefore
above criticism.
If life is "spiritual" why don't you just call it "life"?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
