XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.paranormal.reincarnation
From: kiwi@ing.notin.aus
There is only one way to completely discredit Billy Meier's UFO photographs,
100% - and that is for someone wishing to prove this, by going to the
original sites of those photographs (which is accessible) and then using
a similar camera to Billy Meiers - that is broken the same way, it couldn't
focus on close-up objects - and then set up their models/etc that Billy
Meier supposedly did, to take those photographs, and then show the world
the results of these 'fakes'. No one has done that. Why? Because it can't
be done physically. Any attempt will obviously show that it can't be done,
and the result will be unconvincing. Egg on the face of the person who
tries doing this.
This is discussed in detail by Wendelle Stevens who was the earliest?
researcher into the Billy Meier story. He gave a retrospective account
of what happened at that time (including that MUFON report about Meier)
in a presentation that was made at a International UFO Congress in 2001,
that was videotaped. He recounts in detail about his own investigation
into Billy Meier's photographs - all of them, in precise detail.
He gives a slideshow presentation of the photographs and gives background
information about all of them.
It is not physically possible to fake the UFO photographs at those
original locations, due to the natural terrain there.
Wendelle Stevens doesn't just show the one photograph taken at that time,
but the many that were taken in sequence.
Anyway the only way to truly evaluate Billy Meier, is to do it yourself,
and go through the UFO Contact Notes, whether in text or audio tape format.
There is a great deal of information detailed, that covers many areas of
knowledge. If any part of it is shown to be false and incorrect, that will
also mean the entire information given, is highly suspect too.
There is incredible detail of information given - specific information.
No one could 'make' this up - because it will mean that details will be
wrong here and there, everywhere in the material.
This is dated around 1975 - parts as early as 1965, some in 1985.
You shouldn't read/listen to this material with your mind already made
up about it. After listening/reading it, you can try disproving the material,
if you think it is false, similarly you can verify if the material is genuine,
by seeing if the information is correct?
If you look at the original photographs, especially the high quality ones in
their natural size (100%) - it should be plainly obvious that it is not
faked - remember these were taken in 1975-1985. Note how sharp the
UFO object is, with no sign of it being suspended.
Do some research? Won't you? Some of your own, and try using that brain of
yours and do some original evaluation of your own. Instead of just relying
upon one source of information.
Harvey
In article , Looky@mysig.foremail
says...
>
>On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 05:55:11 GMT, kiwi@ing.notin.aus (Your Name
>Here=Harvey) in accordance with The Prophecy scribed:
>
>>According to Plejaren (Billy Meier) information
>
>Only some of his UFO pics he faked. Some source you
>got there.
>
>http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/AndyPage/meier.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>DrPostman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
>Member,Board of Directors, afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULTŪ #15-51506-253.
>AFA-B Official Pollster & Hammer of Thor winner - August 2004
>You can email me at: DrPostman(at)gmail.com
>
>"I venture to say there is no one writing on the
>Internet today who is providing a greater purpose
>for mankind than that found in my writings."
> - Felonious Ray, destroyer of irony meters
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
