From: you@somehost.somedomain.aus   
      
   In article , whateve   
   @twixtntween.com says...   
   >   
   >On Tue, 30 May 2006 23:59:15 -0600, Crowfoot    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>In article <6vmo725nkj4go9oaavl8qpm4h6otfgstej@4ax.com>,   
   >> Jyeshta  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Tue, 30 May 2006 02:15:38 -0600, Crowfoot    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> >In article <3sce72lnobvdo6fnrka4tc09n1g4u6sjhb@4ax.com>,   
   >>> > Jyeshta  wrote:   
   >>> >   
   >>> >> On Thu, 25 May 2006 13:55:07 -0400, Kimba W. Lion   
   >>> >>  wrote:   
   >>> >>   
   >>> >> >On Thu, 25 May 2006 12:09:02 -0500, Jyeshta    
   >>> >> >wrote:   
   >>> >> >   
   >>> >> >>Has anyone read the book in the subject line?  The thought that we are   
   >>> >> >>our loved ones' heaven seems to go completely against everything else   
   >>> >> >>I have read about the afterlife, being that there's a beautiful place   
   >>> >> >>with endless things to do and that our departed loved ones are calm   
   >>> >> >>knowing we'll be joining them soon.   
   >>> >> >   
   >>> >> >It's obvious that you haven't read the book. Why don't you find out   
   >>> >> >something about the book for yourself? Go to Amazon.com and read the   
   >>> >> >Introduction from the book.   
   >>> >>   
   >>> >> No, I haven't read the book - only saw a snippet of an interview with   
   >>> >> her on TV in which she stated that we are their heaven.  I'll try to   
   >>> >> find the introduction, thanks.   
   >>> >   
   >>> >Don't waste your time.  Try "Messages from Michael" by Chelsea   
   >>> >Quinn Yarbro instead.   
   >>> >   
   >>> >C   
   >>>   
   >>> Thank you.  Is that the same Michael from the channeled Michael   
   >>> teachings?   
   >>   
   >>Yep; but there are a lot of people out there claiming to channel   
   >>"Michael", and my experience is that most of them are fakes.  The   
   >>distinguishing characteristic, as I've encountered it, is that the   
   >>original and true Michael teachings are absolutely adamant on   
   >>questions of free choice.  Any purported "Michael" stuff that claims to   
   >>predict the future (which is created moment by moment by the choices   
   >>made by all of us, not, according to M., laid down in advance) or that   
   >>tells anyone what they "should" do is bullshit.  If you read Yarbro's   
   >>book (or books -- there are several further volumes) before going on to   
   >>any of the derivative crap produced by various cultish frauds trying to   
   >>cash in on the idea of Michael, you'll get a sense of the backbone of   
   >>the real deal pretty quickly.   
   >>   
   >>I've been attending sessions with the several mediums Yarbro worked   
   >>with for these books for about 25 yrs now, long before any of the   
   >>phonies jumped in with their schemes to turn Michael into money-   
   >>making schemes for themselves.  Far as I can tell, this only Yarbro's   
   >>books are the real McCoy here.  But if you find the material   
   >>off-putting, by all means move on to something more comfortable.   One   
   >>size does not fit all (as Michael continually advises).   
   >>   
   >>C   
   >>   
   >>C.   
   >   
   >Thank you for explaining the above.  Actually, I'm not sure the   
   >legitimate Michael material would suit me well.  I've been a student   
   >of astrology for nearly 20 years and I don't believe entirely in a   
   >non-deterministic life.  I do believe somewhat in free will, but only   
   >to an extent.  I should point out that many astrologers *do* believe   
   >quite strongly in free will.   
      
   A lot of channelling seems to be an over active imagination engaged in   
   overdrive. few of them provide any real information.   
      
   Harvey   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)