home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy      How big is your tinfoil hat?      97,877 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 95,909 of 97,877   
   None to Vincent Maycock   
   Re: DNA Proves Humans Are NOT An Acciden   
   24 Sep 25 12:54:36   
   
   XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 24, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:03:38 -0700, None  wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 23, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:03:54 -0700, None  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 23, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:26:04 -0700, None  wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > On Sep 22, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 17:38:06 -0700, None  wrote:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > On Sep 22, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:46:08 -0700, None    
   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 22, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   > > > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:47:38 -0700, None    
   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 22, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:<51k2dkp25k552cd68ir6p4luk48   
   q1qia2@4ax.com>):   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 03:12:45 -0700, "Andrew"   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "JTEM" wrote in message news:10apq31   
   1vqea$1@dont-email.me...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
      
      
   > > > It says:   
   > > >   
   > > > 6 After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers   
   > > > and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though   
   > > > some have fallen asleep.   
   > >   
   > > There was no attempt to create history, however, which was your contention.   
   >   
   > Maybe not completely intentionally, but that's what the   
   > legends/fiction found in the Gospels indicate.   
      
   No proof of that exists.   
   >   
   >   
   > > Taken in the light of context,....   
   > >   
   > > 1Co 15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day   
   > > according to the scriptures:   
   > >   
   > > 1Co 15:5 And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:   
   > >   
   > > 1Co 15:6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of   
   > > whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep.   
   > >   
   > > 1Co 15:7 After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles.   
   > >   
   > > Paul related what he was told by those that were there at the scene when it   
   > > happened. Paul was not part of that crowd at that time for he was   
   > > persecuting them.   
   >   
   > So the earliest "history" of the New Testament has Jesus simply   
   > "appearing" mystically to those who were interested, without   
   > supposedly walking and talking physically among the believers like   
   > chronologically later passages in the Gospels claim. And the 500   
   > witnesses have nothing to do with what Paul was doing before his   
   > conversion.   
      
   Where do you come off with that info? It is absurd by any definition.   
   >   
   >   
   > > There are other places in scripture that confirms these things, if you care   
   > > to find the truth, such as,...   
   > >   
   > > Act 13:29 And when they had fulfilled all that was written of him, they   
   took   
   > > him down from the tree, and laid him in a sepulchre.   
   > >   
   > > Act 13:30 But God raised him from the dead:   
   > >   
   > > Act 13:31 And he was seen many days of them which came up with him from   
   > > Galilee to Jerusalem, who are his witnesses unto the people.   
   > >   
   > > Act 13:32 And we declare unto you glad tidings, how that the promise which   
   > > was made unto the fathers,   
   >   
   > Obviously, the Bible claims that Jesus rose physically from the dead,   
   > but the question is when did they begin to claim that, and which parts   
   > of the Bible claimed either of those things (mystical appearance   
   > rather than walking and talking with The Eleven after the supposed   
   > resurrection)?   
      
   In the Gospels and in the book of Acts.   
   >   
   >   
   > > > > Hinduism has far more people than the Mormons, does that give them more   
   > > > > legitimacy? Plus they have well over 1K gods.Some claim that Hinduism   
   > > > > existed   
   > > > > before Jesus. They accept spirituality and practice that a lot as well,   
   > > > > even   
   > > > > though it is evil. See the rabbit holes in the thinking of the mind of   
   > > > > men?   
   > > > > Given your reasoning a person could justify adultery by telling you   
   that   
   > > > > as   
   > > > > they were doing it, they were thinking of you and thus justify it.   
   > > >   
   > > > If Hinduism is a false religion, there must've been a point in time   
   > > > when its founders were trying to create history, but according to you   
   > > > they would've been disproven and discredited, leading to the collapse   
   > > > of their religion -- but they're still here. How do you explain that?   
   > >   
   > > That is pure foolishness, and you have no historical basis of thought for   
   > > that.   
   >   
   > The point is, a wrong idea (like the supposed resurrection of Jesus)   
   > can spread easily without it necessarily being based on facts.   
      
   Which is why the followers of Jesus wrote it down, and mention others who   
   were also witnesses to the facts.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > So they vilified the non-Messianic Jews (referred to as   
   simply "the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Jews"), blaming them for Jesus' death and attacking   
   Jewish sects   
   > > > > > > > > > > > like   
   > > > > > > > > > > > the Pharisees as they wrote the Gospels.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > That, my friend, is misleading and without understanding.   
   They were   
   > > > > > > > > > > to   
   > > > > > > > > > > be   
   > > > > > > > > > > blamed for the Death of Christ, and they knew it at the   
   time.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Even the Jews who had nothing to do with Jesus' crucifixion   
   (e.g.,   
   > > > > > > > > > children)?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > All the ones in that crowd that proclaimed it were accepting   
   the   
   > > > > > > > > responsibility and with such emphasis that they were fully   
   willing to   
   > > > > > > > > hold   
   > > > > > > > > their children and their children’s children as culpable as   
   well.   
   > > > > > > > > They   
   > > > > > > > > did   
   > > > > > > > > so knowing full well the severity of doing such a thing before   
   God and   
   > > > > > > > > Man,   
   > > > > > > > > and people in that culture did not take such things likely as   
   they   
   > > > > > > > > considered themselves bound by their words.   
   > > > > > > >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca