XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.survival, alt.politics.trump   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 06:50:17 -0600, Rodney Luther King   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 10/14/2025 2:09 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 20:10:31 -0600, Rodney Luther King   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 10/13/2025 5:48 PM, Governor Swill wrote:   
   >>>> Rodney and c186282 are both conspiracy theorists.  When the (sic) lack the   
   >>>> information necessary to make a decision or work something out   
   >>>   
   >>> Then we decide that it would be a good topic for discussion in certain   
   >>> usenet discussion groups.  Often, instead of serving as a catalyst for a   
   >>> stimulating and elucidating discussion, we are attacked by persons like   
   >>> "Governor Swill" for having the audacity to suggest possible root causes   
   >>> of events like the Tennessee explosion, or the Palestine, Ohio railroad   
   >>> disaster where a railroad tank car full of vinyl chloride was set on   
   >>> fire by incompetent emergency responders, or when an oil refinery   
   >>> exploded recently in Los Angeles, or when a ship lost power and collided   
   >>> the Francis Scott Key bridge near Baltimore.   
   >>   
   >>       None of which have been found to be the result of sabotage. But,   
   >> of course, that's what *THEY* want everyone to think, right?   
   >>   
   >>> "Governor Swill" stamps his feet and flails around because "Rodney   
   >>> Luther King" and "c186282" dare to think outside the narrow bounds of   
   >>> the mainstream media and question whether what caused the explosion in   
   >>> Tennessee might NOT be an "industrial accident" and might have been   
   >>> sabotage or perhaps a drone attack from someone outside of the   
   >>> explosives facility.   
   >>   
   >>       Present your best evidence that, at the very least, shows your   
   >> claim is in any way plausible. As of the time I write this, everything   
   >> I've seen and heard suggests it was an industrial accident.   
   >   
   >Please break down what the "everything" is that "suggests" there is no   
   >need for the BATF to investigate the explosion as possibly more than an   
   >industrial "accident."  You seem to be on a mission to make any American   
   >who thinks the topic is worth discussing and speculating on is a kook   
   >and a nut job.   
      
        Your avoidance is a STRONG indication that you have NOTHING to   
   offer in support of your conspiracy delusion.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)