XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: soc.history.ancient   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/4/25 5:25 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
      
   > What I think is that, of the 100+ climate models that the IPCC is using,   
   > our World's future average global temperatures will be within one   
   > standard deviation of all of those models, excluding the upper & lower   
   > 10%.   
      
   #1.  Absolutely NOTHING WHAT SO EVER to do with the Delayed Choice   
   Quantum Entanglement.   
      
   #2.  The only way to judge the future results of "Climate Models" is   
   to look at the past predictions and the real outcomes. They show a   
   100% failure rate.   
      
   #3.  The underlying defect in your thinking, what excludes any   
   possibility of "Science," is that you're comparing the Holocene to   
   itself.   
      
   Who cares?   
      
   If you want to know what the Holocene should look like, why not compare   
   it to the previous interglacial, or the one before that?   
      
   Oo!  I know:  It's because they were warmer. Some 130,000 years before   
   the industrial revolution, Neanderthals ruling Europe and it was   
   warmer, sea level was roughly 16 feet higher from all the melted ice   
   and the "Thermal Expansion."   
      
   So a reasonable, rational test says Gwobull Warbling is a farce, and   
   going by your own climate models -- past predictions -- it's all a   
   farce, yet we need to impoverish BILLIONS to save the polar bears?   
      
   AND THEN there's the fact this you derailed yourself. You're replying   
   to a thread on the Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement experiments   
   and observations, not a thread on climate change.   
      
   Seems your disconnect from facts is pretty inclusive...   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)