XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: soc.history.ancient   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/8/25 9:52 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
      
   > You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation   
   > that supports retrocausality   
      
   Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement   
      
   That's one.   
      
   Actually, if you do the Google, it started with light originating   
   a gazillion years ago, observed through gravitational lensing.   
      
   > vis-à-vis some sort of "time travel".   
      
   The thing you've got to remember about Einstein is that, according   
   to him time is "Relative." Its not the same for everyone everywhere   
   but the different observations are correct for everyone everywhere.   
      
   In other words, if I see it happening backwards, it really happened   
   backwards, even if some other perspective says it happened at the   
   same time.   
      
   > As   
   > for #2, we will have to agree to disagree.  No theoretical physicist   
   > believes that any and all solutions to GR/QFT is indicative of some   
   > natural occurrence in the real World.   
      
   You're just making shit up.   
      
   The fact is, if someone is within the realm of possibilities then it   
   all comes down to probabilities, and as unlikely as it is occur it   
   had to occur.   
      
   The universe is just too big.   
      
   Like I said:  Purely natural NUCLEAR FREAKING REACTORS have existed,   
   and no doubt do exist on other worlds.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)