XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: soc.history.ancient   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/9/25 8:56 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
      
   > What you're posting is just nuts.   
      
   No. It's actually pretty conservative. But you're not just insane,   
   you're an idiot.   
      
   If something is within the realm of possibilities -- and as you   
   yourself admitted, time travel is -- then it all comes down to   
   PROBABILITIES.   
      
   If it's a ONCE IN A BILLION SUNS EVENT, we're looking at it   
   happening 100 to 400 times over the life of our galaxy.   
      
   There are 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe. So if   
   it's a ONCE IN A TRILLION SUNS EVENT, we're looking at 200 to   
   800 trillion times over the life of the observable universe.   
      
   The numbers are staggering. The numbers are so massive that   
   virtually ANYTHING possible is, over the life of our universe   
   anywhere from probably to ALREADY HAPPENED.   
      
   >  Some reactions (both nuclear and/or   
   > chemical) have a probability of ZERO occurring.   
      
   We are speaking of things that have been determined to be   
   possible, not impossible.   
      
   Nothing excludes backwards time travel. And to achieve that   
   all we need do is a change in perspective. After all, time   
   is relative, it's different for two observers, so for one   
   there is no backwards time movement but for the other there   
   is. One example of this is the Photon which can't play by   
   our rules because it doesn't correspond to time. So, for us,   
   information can move backwards even though for the photon it   
   is not.   
      
   But, the real game changer would be faster-than-light   
   particles like a tachyon. If we can prove they exist, figure   
   out how to detect them, even if only indirectly, and we can   
   figure out how to produce them, we just created a time machine   
   for information. We can communicate with the past.   
      
   The one drawback is that we could not send information back   
   any further than the construction of the detector.   
      
   > The above is a chemical reaction which cannot happen.   
      
   Is this why you won't take your meds?   
      
   We already know that the individual pieces exist and are real:   
      
   Photons, the fact that our concept of time does not apply to   
   them, the fact that our concept of space does not apply to   
   them and thus we can produce results that move backwards in   
   time FOR US.   
      
   > Your example of natural fission (or, fusion) reactions is irrelevant.   
      
   No, you're just retarded.   
      
   It's an example of how technology is merely harnessing the power of   
   nature. All technology. Science figures out how nature works, tech   
   is the application of that knowledge. AND THIS IS TRUE IN ALL CASES.   
      
   It couldn't be any more simple.   
      
   There have been "Reenactors" who easily bested ancient Roman Iron   
   production, using Roman tech, even though the Roman economy was   
   dependent upon that tech. How? Because the modern reenactors   
   understood the science guiding the process so they were just better,   
   more efficient, without even consciously trying.   
      
   Turns out that the Romans, lacking our understanding of the science,   
   were so bad at iron production that their slag -- the waste/biproduct   
   -- was a major source of Iron for Mussolini.   
      
    > Those types of reactions are POSSIBLE, as opposed to backwards >   
   causality, which is IMPOSSIBLE.   
      
   Observations appear to confirm it.   
      
   But, as per Einstein, it all comes down to "Relativity."   
      
   > Our "big universe" is irrelevant   
      
   No. You're just retarded.   
      
   The appeal to size/scale is the entire basis for SETI and even   
   ridiculous claims such as the Fermi "Paradox," which isn't even   
   a paradox, for Christ's sake...   
      
   But, the very concept of life on other worlds is that the universe   
   is far too large for their not to be any.   
      
   Because you are retarded you can not take knowledge you have HERE,   
   and apply it THERE. You are literally pretending that the rules,   
   the very laws of nature begin anew with every topic...   
      
    the same physics applies everywhere.   
      
   Lol!  You ARE retarded!  It's not just an act!   
      
   If the same physics apply everywhere then the photon never experiences   
   time nor distance. However, we do. So for us things happen at different   
   times and in different places even if not for the photon:   
      
   Retrocausality!   
      
   And, yes, according to Einstein, this is the way things are supposed   
   to work! AND, from both perspectives the observation is TRUE!   
      
   So for us IT IS TRUE that information moved backwards in time, for   
   the photon it happened simultaneously.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)