XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.paranormal   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: chine.bleu@yahoo.com   
      
   Dawn Flood wrote:   
   > To my knowledge, you have never cited any scholars who support any of   
   > your views.  In a couple of other threads, you have claimed that modern   
   > climate science is all a bunch of crap, and yet, the largest number of   
   > coauthors to a published scientific paper concerned itself with   
   > anthropogenic climate change:   
   >   
   > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Scientists%27_Warning_to_Humanity   
   >   
   > And, yet, you will not even cite the climate deniers:   
   >   
   > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial   
   >   
   > Unlike any true scholar, you don't have any need to appeal to any one   
   > else's work other than your own.   
      
   The value of any encyclopedia are the references. They lead to all the   
   facts, and can even open a network of facts so the reader can read the   
   original resources and make their own conclusion. If any wants to attack   
   wikipedia, attack their use of references. Articles can be crap, but   
   with proper cites you can ignore the article and still get information.   
      
   --   
   Siri Seal of Disavowal #777-000. Disavowed. Denied.  @   
   NO KINGS    For I desire mercy not sacrifice.       /|\   
   The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 5.5        / \   
   of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)