home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy      How big is your tinfoil hat?      97,877 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 97,269 of 97,877   
   Dawn Flood to chine.bleu   
   Re: This is why Wikipedia is a disgrace   
   19 Nov 25 18:14:47   
   
   XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.paranormal   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/19/2025 3:56 PM, chine.bleu wrote:   
   > Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >> To my knowledge, you have never cited any scholars who support any of   
   >> your views.  In a couple of other threads, you have claimed that modern   
   >> climate science is all a bunch of crap, and yet, the largest number of   
   >> coauthors to a published scientific paper concerned itself with   
   >> anthropogenic climate change:   
   >>   
   >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Scientists%27_Warning_to_Humanity   
   >>   
   >> And, yet, you will not even cite the climate deniers:   
   >>   
   >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial   
   >>   
   >> Unlike any true scholar, you don't have any need to appeal to any one   
   >> else's work other than your own.   
   >   
   > The value of any encyclopedia are the references. They lead to all the   
   > facts, and can even open a network of facts so the reader can read the   
   > original resources and make their own conclusion. If any wants to attack   
   > wikipedia, attack their use of references. Articles can be crap, but   
   > with proper cites you can ignore the article and still get information.   
   >   
      
   Yeppers!!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca