XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism
XPost: soc.history.ancient
From: Kenito@Benito.naw
On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 14:56:05 -0500, JTEM wrote:
>On 12/13/25 1:11 PM, Kenito Benito wrote:
>>On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:12:36 -0500, JTEM wrote:
>>
>>>On 12/12/25 4:36 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:24:31 -0600, Dawn Flood
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 12/10/2025 3:22 PM, JTEM wrote:
>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeppers! I can't derive the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you're pretending to address... what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't play your over-the-top narcissism game and I'm never
>>>>>> going to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> YOU are pretending to address the fact that photons don't experience
>>>>>> time. And it is a fact, and you even acknowledged it. Yet you're
>>>>>> pretending to refute what I say... idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We do experience time. For us, there is a past, there is a present
>>>>>> and there is a future. Photons don't experience time and we do. This
>>>>>> is why photons break all our rules of nature, as in the case of
>>>>>> Retrocausality or "Quantum Strangeness at a Distance."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This actually translates to The Multiverse, which Einstein describes
>>>>>> but doesn't name so idiots can't comprehend that he said it, described
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "He didn't use that word so he never talked about it!"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Google & misunderstand Simultaneity. Take your time. We can laugh
>>>>>> at you over it later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOTE: Einstein's Simultaneity and the famous "Train hit by lightening"
>>>>>> thought experiment is illustrating Retrocausality in the Delayed
>>>>>> Choice Quantum Entanglement experiment in that from one perspective
>>>>>> both lightening bolts happen at the exact same time, and from another
>>>>>> perspective one of them happens FIRST and then the other. BOTH
>>>>>> PERSPECTIVES ARE RIGHT! BOTH ARE REAL! That is the part that you stupid
>>>>>> people can't wrap your head around.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, no, and no!! The thought experiment by Professor Einstein only
>>>>>relates to events that are acausal. If one event causes another event,
>>>>>then ***ALL*** observers in our entire Universe will agree that 'Event
>>>>>A' came *before* 'Event B'.
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you understand this??
>>>>
>>>> John probably doesn't understand. He has claimed he's not yet 10
>>>>years of age, so he isn't too likely to have been taught. But he
>>>>doesn't care.
>>>> Being right has NEVER been his goal. Simply using 'argumentum ad
>>>>hominem' seems to be his only motive and goal.
>>>
>>>It's a discussion group, you demented twat.
>>
>> Thank you for proving me 100% correct. You are dismissed.
>
>It's not about me,
Again, you are dismissed. If I am so important to you that you
MUST seek out my attention, so be it. You will continue to prove this
by your refusal to accept reality.
--
Kenito Benito
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
