XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.clinton, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.congress   
   From: rapists_queers_and_general_all_around_democrat_assholes@freedyn.de   
      
   In every single child pornography case handled by Judge Jackson, she   
   went below the maximum recommendation, below the minimum   
   recommendation, and below the prosecutor’s request.   
      
   The facts in many of these cases are far more heinous, and brutal –   
   even in the cases involving teenagers. In the now much-discussed   
   2013 case, United States v. Hawkins, Wesley Keith Hawkins was   
   arrested for possession of child pornography and sentenced by Judge   
   Jackson to just three months in prison despite the prosecution   
   asking for two years.   
      
   In 2013, Hawkins was busted posting videos on YouTube of   
   ‘prepubescent boys engaged in sexual activity with each other,   
   including oral and anal penetration,’ according to court documents.   
   He told an undercover officer that he preferred children as young as   
   11 and sent him a video of a ‘prepubescent male masturbating.’   
   Investigators recovered 17 videos from his phone and laptop, which   
   showed, among other things, ‘an approximately 11-year-old male being   
   anally penetrated by an adult male.’   
      
   In her sentencing, Jackson ruled she didn’t think the volume and   
   content of porn he had was particularly egregious and she gave   
   Hawkins essentially a slap on the wrist — and then apologized to him   
   for it.   
      
   ‘This is a truly difficult situation,’ she told Hawkins at   
   sentencing. ‘I appreciate that your family is in the audience. I   
   feel so sorry for them and for you and for the anguish that this has   
   caused all of you.’   
      
   Hawkins later went on to re-offend, and Judge Jackson placed him in   
   a halfway house for six months.   
      
   The other child pornography cases overseen by Jackson do not involve   
   teenagers. They involve grown men actively seeking to groom children   
   to have sexual intercourse, the distribution of sadomasochist   
   pornography with depictions of young male children, and a case where   
   a criminal distributed 102 child pornography videos and shared lewd   
   photos of his 10-year-old daughter, among others.   
      
   In every single child pornography case handled by Judge Jackson, she   
   went below the maximum recommendation, below the minimum   
   recommendation, and below the prosecutor’s request.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)