Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.crime    |    Exploring the darker side of society    |    1,021 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 699 of 1,021    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    Disparate treatment of Agnew, Biden brib    |
|    12 Dec 23 08:46:27    |
      XPost: alt.politics.org.fbi, alt.politics.trump, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics       From: yourdime@outlook.com              From the time of the Enlightenment, there has been the widespread belief       in equal treatment under the law. That pillar of Western civilization is       now under attack, as shown by the shameless and disgusting statements by       three Ivy League university presidents who claimed that advocating       elimination of Jews was OK in the proper “context.”              Other examples include the destruction of certain women’s sports by       allowing athletes who were biologically male at birth but claim to be       female to compete with women and the failure to allow a major undefeated       college football team (Florida State) to compete in the playoffs for the       national championship while giving the playoff slot to a team with a loss,       Alabama.              I could go on, but the most serious breakdown of consistent standards is       the disparate treatment of former Vice President Spiro Agnew and President       Biden, both of whom are credibly alleged to have taken bribes.              For those who were not yet born or have forgotten the Agnew case (which in       many ways is similar to the Biden case), here is a brief review.              Spiro Agnew had served as Baltimore County executive and subsequently as       governor of Maryland before Richard Nixon selected him as his vice       presidential running mate in 1968.              In 1972, Maryland’s U.S. attorney opened an investigation of possible       corruption in Baltimore County involving political leaders and private       contractors. Since Agnew had not been county executive since 1966, the       assumption was that he was not involved, and furthermore, the statute of       limitations had expired.              During the investigation, one of the contractors admitted as part of a       plea agreement that he had been kicking back 5% of the value of some       contracts to Agnew, and that the payments had continued into Agnew’s vice       presidency, even though he had not held office in Maryland in years.              When Agnew learned of the investigation alleging tax fraud and corruption,       and when it was subsequently leaked to the press, he publicly proclaimed       his innocence and called the stories “damned lies.” (Note: President Biden       has used almost identical language in denying that he received any       benefits from the payments from Ukraine and China to his son.)              In 1973, Attorney General Elliot Richardson, who had an impeccable       reputation for competency and honesty (unlike the current attorney       general, Merrick Garland) was given responsibility for the investigation       by Nixon. (Note: The Agnew case was completely separate from the Watergate       case.)              As the evidence mounted, Agnew, who was being pressured to resign, took       the position that a sitting vice president could not be indicted — based       on the precedent of an 1826 charge against Vice President John C. Calhoun,       who was alleged to have taken improper payments when he was a Cabinet       member.              Agnew continued to insist that he was innocent, but he entered plea       negotiations on the condition that he receive no jail time.              In October 1973, Agnew pleaded no contest to felony tax evasion and agreed       to resign as vice president, pay a $10,000 fine, and serve three years’       unsupervised probation. Later, Agnew denied wrongdoing, saying he had       resigned in the best interest of the nation to prevent prolonged division       and uncertainty.              At the time, there was widespread agreement among Republican and       Democratic leaders in Congress that Agnew was unfit to serve as president       (given the increasing likelihood of a Nixon resignation because of       Watergate).              Agnew’s agreement to resign on the condition of no jail time was widely       applauded and accepted as the best outcome. House Minority Leader Gerald       Ford was then selected by Nixon and overwhelmingly approved by Congress as       the new vice president.              The bribery allegations against Mr. Biden are much more serious than those       against Agnew because they involve payments by foreign state entities for       alleged attempts to influence U.S. policy in both Ukraine and China. Mr.       Biden’s defenders claim that there is no evidence that he directly       received payments from Chinese or Ukrainian government officials or from       people in state-owned companies. (Note: It is not necessary to have       received a direct payment to be an indirect beneficiary of a bribe.)              There is concrete evidence that Biden family members shared in the       foreign-supplied funds, which were run through numerous shell companies.              The Justice Department has yet to charge Hunter Biden or other members of       the Biden family for failure to register as foreign agents, even though it       is clear that Hunter was required to do so under the law. In addition, the       money laundering regulations are broad, in part, because they not only       apply to the person or entities that acquired ill-gotten funds but also       require that institutional recipients of funds from questionable sources       know the source of such funds.              In many respects, the case of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort       was similar. Mr. Manafort was sent to jail for failing to register as a       foreign agent and for money laundering, among other charges.              The House committees investigating the Biden family’s activities need       answers to the above questions and many others. President Biden resigning       without jail time, like Vice President Agnew, would not be the worst       outcome.              https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/dec/11/inconsistent-standards-       and-rules-persist/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca