XPost: alt.home.repair, ny.politics   
   From: T@invalid.invalid   
      
   On 3/19/24 17:38, Skid Marks wrote:   
   > Ed P wrote:   
   >> On 3/19/2024 5:45 PM, Ralph Mowery wrote:   
   >>> In article , democrat-   
   >>> criminals@mail.house.gov says...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In New York City, a person can claim ?squatter?s rights? after just 30   
   >>>> days of living at a property.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> It looks like people would chck into their homes more often than every   
   >>> 30 days and if they take off for another home on vacation have someone   
   >>> look at the house.   
   >>>   
   >>> If I found someone in my house I would ask them to leave and if they did   
   >>> not it would be a 911 call to pick up some bodies that wree trying to   
   >>> harm me as my life was in danger.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> I was thinking the same.  I'd never let a house sit that long without   
   >> someone checking it.  Not to mention, you can get various security and   
   >> camera systems fairly cheap.   
   >>   
   >> The owner certainly does not deserve the problems, but they are fairly   
   >> easily prevented.  Even a Ring doorbell would have saved her.   
   >>   
   >> When I go away, someone is in my house at least once a week even with   
   >> monitoring.   
   >   
   > Stolen elections have consequences.   
      
   No fooling!   
      
   > This is Democrat run New York. It is ALWAYS the victims fault. ALWAYS!   
   >   
   > The victim/homeowner should be forced to pay a half billion bond to   
   > Latisha James before she can get her house back.   
      
   It would almost serve you better to pay an armed guard   
   with a big dog to house sit whilst your house was vacant.   
   A couple of bites from rin-tin-tin and ...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)