[continued from previous message]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI, its also not the only bill that your dear old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grandpa stuck you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with: there's also their growth of the Federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debt too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So... have you been a responsible parent who ha's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worked to decrease
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this burden on your children?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or have you allowed it to fester & grow to be even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worse for them than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you've had, which shows that you're a selfish dick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not an adult comment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A good way to respond to ridiculous nonsense...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, DEI and Affirmative Action are racist and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violate federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> civil-rights. It's against federal law to use race and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender to sift
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out potential applicants.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except for the fact that DEI/AA does not "sift out" as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is being claimed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure it does.. if it promotes the hiring of someone for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> race/sex then by consequence it denies equal opportunity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to those of the wrong race/sex.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've already been corrected on this: the action isn't a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitutional violation because it is effectively a civil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penalty legally imposed as compensation for past crimes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it is a constitutional violation as
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, scooter, you Constitution-ignorant fucktard. You don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> know the Constitution or any other part of the law, scooter,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and you never will. As just one flagrant example of your
>>>>>>>>>>>> stupidity, scooter, you think unlawful presence in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> country is a criminal offense, and it is not. You're stupid,
>>>>>>>>>>>> scooter. You're stupid because you like being stupid.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What part of unlawful
>>>>>>>>>> What part of
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable
>>>>>>>>>> alien to remain in the United States.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is when they commit crimes!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Look at what this stupid fucktard "Chad" is saying. He is saying
>>>>>>>> that unlawful presence, which is not a crime,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's stop right here..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove that unlawful presence is not a crime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have, scooter.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you haven't.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, scooter, I have.
>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, we'll stop right here, scooter. Unlawful presence is not a
>>>>>> crime.
>>>>>
>>>>> And yet you can't show that it isn't.
>>>>
>>>> I have shown that, scooter. Stop lying.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> If someone who is unlawfully present is detected by ICE and put
>>>>>> into deportation proceedings, the worst that can happen is
>>>>>> deportation.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, actually the worst that can happen is being thrown in jail.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong, scooter.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's what happens to people who commit unlawful acts.
>>>>
>>>> Only unlawful acts that are crimes, scooter.
>>>
>>> Unlawful acts??
>>
>> Yes, scooter.
>
> Like felony trespassing resulting from unlawful presence
No such thing, you cocksucker.
1. Unlawful presence is *never* "trespassing."
2. Trespassing is *only* a misdemeanor.
You lose, cuntflaps.
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
